Hello ! ;-) 2009/11/12 Ecaterina Valica <[email protected]>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 19:24, Thibaut DEVERAUX > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Hi thanks, > > > > I understand. :-) > > > > > > Well, sites use a lot a form that is completly different than the output. > > This is not the best, I agree. Generally the reason is that the > information > > from a single form is redispatched in different pages. > > > > User understand this. The fill a form with data, and the site will use > them > > data to create a page. > > > > Yet, this can be a bit "burocratic" in the feelings. Also user get a bit > > lost in the resulting page because they have to take new reperes. Also > this > > limit the feeling of "I create my page". > > > > > > I prefer too versions most "in place", most "WYSIWYG". Well... Most in > the > > Wiki logic too. > > > > I think you can even do best than doubling the name as a compromise to > make > > it : > > > > http://thibaut.deveraux.free.fr/xwiki/Profil-In_place_render.png > > > > http://thibaut.deveraux.free.fr/xwiki/Profil-In_place_edit.png > > > > Interesting concept - I am not really sure about the implementation of the > fields inside the page's title. This is a classic "edit in place" pattern. > Could be useful also when we are editing the page's name, content, etc. The > problem is that this pattern isn't widely adopted inside XWiki's > implementation. > You speak of using "in place" evrywhere ? It should, lol. ^_^ More seriously, this is a mater of choice for the UX strategy. I would recomand it, yet it is only my advice. :-) > > Have a nice day > > > > Thibaut > > > > > > PS : > > > > /!\ Sharing the UX sources in an Open Source project /!\ > > > > It took me more than half an hour to photoshop your renders to make my > > proposal. > > If I had sources I could modify quickly, it would have been 5mn. > > > > A simple mockup on the paper does not help enough to make a comparaison. > > (Using feelings to drive thinking is important too) > > > > Yet, here, this is complicated. You use HTML to make your proposals. I'm > > most at ease with Photoshop/Gimp/svg. So I'm not sure it would take me > less > > time if I get to design in HTML. > > > > Since I start working for XWiki I had SVG mockups, HTML/CSS mockups or even > partial prototypes. > There is no "standard" format when I make mockups - it's all a matter of > the > complexity/time degree of the proposal and also the probability that > someone > else will want to modify them (this probability slightly increased in the > past time). > > Cool, I understood it bad last time. :-) Nice you use also svg. I'm using this one a lot, find it to be faster to re-arrange, make tests, etc. > > > All of this does not really makes it easy open source UX collaboration. I > > don't know what to say. You have to use the medium you are the most at > ease > > too, so I don't have the solution... > > > > At least please share your HTML files, if this is simplely a few lines to > > change it will be faster in HTML. > > > > I'll do more of that in the future. The thing with sharing HTML/CSS is that > when you make mockups with this technologies, you don't necessarily clean > them - since you are experimenting a lot. > > Lol, add a warning at the top of the file ? ;-) CC-BY-SA-Don'tCleanIt Liscence... Files that are not clean and should not be cleaned because it would be a waste of time. ^_^ > Thanks, > Caty > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > Have a nice day ! Thibaut _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
