On Nov 19, 2009, at 11:26 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 08:50, Vincent Massol <[email protected]>  
> wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 18, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Since we introduce document footer informations view statistics are
>>> store several time for the same user view of a page.
>>>
>>> See http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-4590
>>>
>>> The issue is that theses tabs are loaded asynchronously in ajax and
>>> make a call using view action.
>>>
>>> Here are some solutions:
>>> 1/ introduce a new action "viewinternal", "service" or anything else
>>> that would be a "view" action without UI and not taken into  
>>> account by
>>> statistics (that register for "view" action events)
>>
>> +0
>>
>>> 2/ pretty much the same thing that 1/ but based on a URL parameter
>>
>> +1
>>
>> This is much better to me since:
>> * Stats are a transersval concern, not related to the view action
>> especially. I'm pretty sure we can imagine use cases where we don't
>> want to register stats for actions other than view
>> * The way I'd like to implement the actions later on (xwiki-actions
>> module) is to have action pipelines and this "saving stats" action
>> will be implemented as a post-action that would be injected after the
>> main actions. Thus only this post action will need to check the
>> parameter which will be transparent to the other actions, thus
>> providing a good separation of concern.
>
> So you want statistics module to go look at URL parameters ?

I said the opposite actually: it's the action that should do this.  
Right now (current code) we could just have the view action check for  
the param.

> How would
> you name this parameter ?

Some proposals:
- "stats=true|false" (or 0|1 to follow the current "tradition")
- "logstats"

> Also i really don't like that ajax calls use the standard view action

Can you explain? I don't see the problem.

Thanks
-Vincent

> so the "viewinternal" action is needed anyway IMO.
>
>>
>>> 3/ use an additional AJAX request similar to a google analytics call
>>> to record statistics
>>
>> -1
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent
>>
>>>
>>> As i said in jira I'm against 3/
>>>
>>> 2/ seems too big for a URL parameter to me and it makes statistics
>>> depends on URL parameters where 1/ fix the issue without touching
>>> anything in the statistics module
>>>
>>> +1 for 1/
>>> +0 for 2/
>>> -1 for 3/
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to