On Feb 23, 2010, at 4:59 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 15:38, Jean-Vincent Drean > <[email protected]> wrote: >> -0 for a parameter for the same reasons as Thomas. >> +1 for a new action (/plain/ for example). IMHO If we discover a > > Not sure about "plain" since the main use case that raised this issue > was about the comments content which is html. Unless you don't mean > "plain" as "plain/1.0" renderer syntax but i think we should use > something because it does not reflect the fact it's an kind of > sub/minor query. > > Here is a list coming form the previous mails and some more i can > think of (feel free to add others): > * plain: -1 > * viewinternal: +0 > * internal: -1 (not related enough to view) > * service: -1 (there is no reason a service would not log the result in stats) > * minorview: +0.5 > * subview: +0.5 >
What about a simple "get"? If you want to retrieve a resource for the sake of having it as a part of a bigger request you can use a non-semantically-bound and generic action. This could work for every resource: comments, images, attachments, etc. If, on the other hand, you want some additional behavior associated to a specific semantics of the action (e.g., logging or increasing the pageviews when it's actually a view) you use a more specific action like "view", "download", etc. (like it's done right now) -Fabio _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
