On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 16:35, Fabio Mancinelli <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Feb 23, 2010, at 4:59 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 15:38, Jean-Vincent Drean >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> -0 for a parameter for the same reasons as Thomas. >>> +1 for a new action (/plain/ for example). IMHO If we discover a >> >> Not sure about "plain" since the main use case that raised this issue >> was about the comments content which is html. Unless you don't mean >> "plain" as "plain/1.0" renderer syntax but i think we should use >> something because it does not reflect the fact it's an kind of >> sub/minor query. >> >> Here is a list coming form the previous mails and some more i can >> think of (feel free to add others): >> * plain: -1 >> * viewinternal: +0 >> * internal: -1 (not related enough to view) >> * service: -1 (there is no reason a service would not log the result in >> stats) >> * minorview: +0.5 >> * subview: +0.5 >> > > What about a simple "get"?
+1 for get > > If you want to retrieve a resource for the sake of having it as a part of a > bigger request you can use a non-semantically-bound and generic action. > This could work for every resource: comments, images, attachments, etc. > > If, on the other hand, you want some additional behavior associated to a > specific semantics of the action (e.g., logging or increasing the pageviews > when it's actually a view) you use a more specific action like "view", > "download", etc. (like it's done right now) > > -Fabio > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
