On Apr 22, 2010, at 5:43 PM, Denis Gervalle wrote: > +0 for the release > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:06, Caleb James DeLisle <[email protected] >> wrote: > >>> +1 we shouldn't delay more IMO since we're already a bit late compared to >> the roadmap and we also have 3 branches to support ATM which is harder than >> it could be ;) >> I like the idea of supporting more than 2 branches. Of course this isn't >> the place to discuss that. >> > > +1 for more branches :)
You do realize that +1 means you're going to have to do the work of maintaining them yourself, right (maybe with Caleb since he also wants to do that + anyone who want to do it) ? :) Maintaining = * merge changes to them * test them * release them I'm certainly -1 to force any dev to do that, we already have way too much work and too little manpower. It's already taxing to support 2 branches. However we don't have any rule for preventing anyone to maintain branches though so there's nothing to change IMO. You can already maintain as many as you want. Which branches would you like to commit to support yourself? Thanks -Vincent _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
