On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 17:53, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Apr 22, 2010, at 5:43 PM, Denis Gervalle wrote: > > > +0 for the release > > > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:06, Caleb James DeLisle < > [email protected] > >> wrote: > > > >>> +1 we shouldn't delay more IMO since we're already a bit late compared > to > >> the roadmap and we also have 3 branches to support ATM which is harder > than > >> it could be ;) > >> I like the idea of supporting more than 2 branches. Of course this isn't > >> the place to discuss that. > >> > > > > +1 for more branches :) > > You do realize that +1 means you're going to have to do the work of > maintaining them yourself, right (maybe with Caleb since he also wants to do > that + anyone who want to do it) ? :) > Hey, don't go too fast, +1 means "I agree and I'll help as I can", and not more ! ;) Maintaining = > * merge changes to them > I already do so for some major fixes on version we have in production. > * test them > I even go to production, this is real life test, no ? > * release them > This is the part I am not aware of, and that I really need to learn more... > I'm certainly -1 to force any dev to do that, we already have way too much > work and too little manpower. It's already taxing to support 2 branches. > > However we don't have any rule for preventing anyone to maintain branches > though so there's nothing to change IMO. You can already maintain as many as > you want. > I will think about that, and Caleb or anyone helps is welcomed > > Which branches would you like to commit to support yourself? > > 2.2 sound great for now, but let me discover the release process first ! I really like the idea of the LTS support of Ubuntu. On a short time, since 5 years is long, but supporting a release for longer than 3 months would be surely useful and appreciated by users So, let me think about this... and helps is welcomed ! Denis -- Denis Gervalle SOFTEC sa - CEO eGuilde sarl - CTO _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
