On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 15:41, Ecaterina Valica <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 13:46, Denis Gervalle <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:19, Ecaterina Valica <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 09:01, Denis Gervalle <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 17:00, Ecaterina Valica <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > It will if it display the inheritance source in a column. For > right > > > set > > > > > at > > > > > > current level this column could even precise what inheritance has > > > been > > > > > > overwritten, both in terms of allowance and origin. > > > > > > > > > > > > Denis. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Denis, > > > > > > > > > > "Something" like this: > > > > > > > http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/Rights51Space > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, "something" like that. I would have expected a "back to basic" > > > button > > > > in place of "advanced, and the removal of the basic interface to > avoid > > > > duplicating basic rights. Maybe the menu should be horizontal in the > > > > advanced interface, I do not know. Also add some hyperlinks to upper > > > level > > > > in the column explaining inheritance. And put the highlight of > changes > > > over > > > > the rest of the row (includes name and inheritance) > > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/Rights51Space > > > > > > About: > > > > > > > I would have expected a "back to basic" button > > > > in place of "advanced, and the removal of the basic interface to > avoid > > > > duplicating basic rights > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/Rights43Proposal/rights52Space.png > > > > > > This removal of the basic interface will be set from the user profile's > > > variables (if it has advanced type)? > > > > > > No, just removed when the advanced interface is shown using the advanced > > button, like you have done. > > > > > > > I mean if the user is advanced, all the > > > rows will be presented in advances? > > > > > > > No, the only thing I proposed is that user that are not set "Advanced > user" > > in their profile, will not be presented the advanced interface link, and > > will never see extended rights. > > > > > > > I'm asking because I think the collapsed view is great to see changes > up > > in > > > the table, where you don't care the advanced status of those rights. > > > > > > > I completely agree. Advanced interface is for understanding and fixing > deep > > complex stuffs > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WDYT ? Is this interesting ? > > > > > > > > > > it's nice :P I would love to see some other opinions. > > > > > > > Yes, could it be possible for you to fix the interactive version to hide > > the > > basics and also to have hover and click work as expected. I think it will > > helps in receiving more feed back with causing confusion. > > > > > Raluca offered to help me fix the interaction. > > > > I found the result really well suited now. There is just some improvement > > in > > color contrast, icons aspect, and so on that should be applied if we get > > approval for this proposal. > > > > Once you have fixed the sample, I think that a summary page (resume of > our > > reflexion, and containing only the final proposal) and than a vote thread > > could be appropriate to receive feedback from other committers, since the > > size of this thread could be pushing back. > > > > Yes, a summary+vote is needed. > > I made a version with pagination and filters added. > http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/Rights51Space > > PNG for the filters: > collapsed: > > http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/Rights43Proposal/filtersCollapsed.png > expanded: > > http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/Rights43Proposal/filtersExpanded.png > > What do you think? > Could this filters be helpful? Are too powerful/complex/useless? > Not sure we really need all these. What is important for me is: - local, global, all user type, with local by default - local, inherited, implied right - user/group name filtering The rest could be convenient, but it also takes unnecessary horizontal space, which is annoying IMO. > From an implementation point of view, can a livetable have more than one > filter per a column. No problem if we use only the .js without de livetable macro. > Anyway this will be a custom livetable, because we also > need to integrate the "add user" part and the "save/reset" buttons. > Yes, it will probably be so. > Also, from an implementation point of view, should we enable multiselect > (ex. to select multiple rights)? > I have made recent fixes for that in the livetable.js, so this is not a problem. > Obs. Right -> Sources -> Implicit refer to the rights that come from the > setting of another right (example: admin means implicit > view+edit+delete+comment; creator means implicit delete). Would this filter > option be useful or it is too much? > Doesn't this also include implicit settings when no right has been set anywhere ? Denis Thanks, > Caty > > > > > > WDYT ? > > > > Denis > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Caty > > > _______________________________________________ > > > users mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Denis Gervalle > > SOFTEC sa - CEO > > eGuilde sarl - CTO > > _______________________________________________ > > devs mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Denis Gervalle SOFTEC sa - CEO eGuilde sarl - CTO _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
