On 09/02/2010 04:06 PM, Jerome Velociter wrote: > > ----- "Fabio Mancinelli"<[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 09/02/2010 11:13 AM, Ecaterina Valica wrote: >> >>>>> Another little remark: I think that user (and application) >> updates >>>>> should be expanded by default without needing the user to click in >> order >>>>> to show the actual message. >>> >>> If we gonna have in the future something like this >>> >> http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/AvatarsProposal/vcard.png >>> where we can put also the status in, then in order to see the status >> message >>> you could just hover the name of the user and you are not gonna have >> to >>> click on it. >>> >>> For me, expanding statuses and application and not pages is >> inconsistency. >>> >> > Also, we can have in the filters (don't know where) an "Expand / >> Collapse >> > All" option for people that have a certain preference in >> displaying. >> > >> > >> >> IMHO, I think that the information and functionality of the "Changed >> status" toggle adds unneeded complexity: when the user sees the avatar >> >> icon in the activity stream she already knows that a "status has >> changed", this information is already conveyed by the fact that an >> entry >> of that type exists! Moreover a status update will contain, il 90% of >> >> the cases, a single message so 90% of the "Changed status" expansion >> will contain only 1 item. >> >> For documents is different because changes can be a lot so the "4 >> changes by 3 contributors" conveys additional information. >> >> What could be done to solve the "consistency" issue is to always >> display >> the first item and hide the others in the collapsed list. >> >> * So for single status updates you will have the status update >> directly >> displayed. > > +1 >
> And it would not shock me either if the style differs a little from the > document updates : no icon but directly the user picture, a bit bigger than > icons. +1 for bigger avatar size. Thanks, Jerome > > Jerome. > >> >> * For multiple status updates by the same user you will have the last >> >> one + a "3 more..." hidden behind the toggle >> >> * For document updates with a single change you will just have the >> change that has been done >> >> * For documents with multiple changes you will have just the latest >> change + "X more changes by Y contributors" toggle with the rest. >> >> This would also solve the problem of having an activity stream >> filtered >> only by "status updates" where the user has to click every time on >> "expand all" in order to actually have the information which should be >> >> available (and expected) by default. >> >> WDYT? >> >> -Fabio >> _______________________________________________ >> devs mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
