On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 15:48, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 great, let's finish this! > > Caty, where does the feedback form send the data when "sent anonymously to > xwiki.org"? > > Who can help Caty finish the form data sending? > Right now the form send all the data to a single address integrated in the service we used for the other forms on xwiki.org (formassembly). Using this third party service I didn't try to validate and manipulate the forms entries. I used the generated form elements and restyled them (by adding new css classes and restructured a bit the form flow). I don't know what are the solutions: implement our own form, have a mail server on xwiki.org configured or just hack that generated form. Thanks, Caty > > Thanks > -Vincent > > On Mar 4, 2011, at 6:53 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I've implemented the proposed version > > > > enterprise > > http://enterprise.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Download > > > > manager > > http://manager.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Download > > > > watch > > http://watch.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Download > > > > xeclipse > > http://xeclipse.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Download > > > > xoffice > > http://xoffice.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Download > > > > Please vote on this versions. > > > > This variant deprecates xwiki:Main.Download and will need also a change > in Panels.Download that will relate to the local Main.Download instead of > the global xwiki: link. > > > > The feedback form is activated so we will receive the messages, but there > is only one general form and the messages are redirected just to one email > address. Some developer needs to fix this in order for the companies > checkbox to work. > > > > Thanks, > > Caty > > > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 16:05, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Caty, > > > > That's good to me. I believe it's a good first version that we can tune > later on. > > > > I'm +1 to implement it like this for now. > > > > Thanks > > -Vincent > > > > On Feb 16, 2011, at 5:40 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > *Design proposal:* > > > > http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/XWikiOrgDownloadRedesign > > > > > > *Mockups:* > > > XWiki Enterprise Manager Download Page > > > > http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/XWikiOrgDownloadRedesign/manager.png > > > > > > XWiki Enterprise Download Page - Part 1 > > > > http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/XWikiOrgDownloadRedesign/enterprisePart1.png > > > > > > XWiki Enterprise Download Page - Part 2 > > > > http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/XWikiOrgDownloadRedesign/enterprisePart2.png > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Caty > > > > > > P.S.* Prototypes* (with incubator style): > > > > http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/XWikiOrgDownloadManager > > > > http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/XWikiOrgDownloadEnterprise1 > > > > http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/XWikiOrgDownloadEnterprise2 > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:17, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi everyone, > > >> > > >> Thanks for your feedback on my previous mail on this topic. I've > discussed > > >> it more with Gregory and Emilie and here's what we'd like to propose > now: > > >> > > >> * Add a Profesional Services heading on the download which would > contain > > >> ** Some text explaining about community support and linking to > > >> http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Support (which already > describes > > >> community support) > > >> ** A livetable containing companies offering professional services for > > >> XWiki. The columns would be: > > >> *** Logo > > >> *** Company name > > >> *** Number of active committers > > >> *** Link to the correct anchor on the Support page ( > > >> http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Support) > > >> ** The livetable would only show 3 entries > > >> ** The livetable would be sorted by active committers by default > > >> ** A text that explains how to add a new company to the list and which > > >> would point to the Governance page ( > > >> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Governance) > > >> > > >> * We will remove the current XWiki SAS support link since that > information > > >> will be moved to the livetable > > >> > > >> * Rework the download page so that when a download link is clicked, it > > >> opens a new page containing the feedback questionnaire while the > download > > >> happens > > >> ** Note that for this to be technically possible I propose to remove > the > > >> link to the OW2 mirrors and instead link to the only existing mirror > (OW2 > > >> seems to have only 1...). If not, we would need some code to compute > which > > >> OW2 mirror to use based on the location. > > >> > > >> * The feedback questionnaire page would contain the following: > > >> ** The following questionnaire: > > >> > http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Drafts/SatisfactionSurveyProducts(let'stune > the questions together) > > >> ** The questionnaire would start with a first question asking to which > > >> companies it should be sent to. We would list all companies offering > > >> professional support (using checkboxes) with a special text for the > top one > > >> ("Top contributor") and in parenthesis listing the number of active > > >> committers. For example: > > >> > > >> [ ] XWiki SAS - Top contributor with 15 active committers > > >> [ ] Softec - 1 active committer > > >> > > >> ** A text explaining that it's optional and what the questionnaire > will be > > >> used for, i.e. that > > >> *** it will be published anonymously on xwiki.org to improve the > product > > >> *** it will be sent to the companies for which the user has checked > the box > > >> > > >> > > >> We've tried to design this proposal with taking 2 ideas into account: > > >> 1) that it's fair and that all companies can have a fair visibility > > >> 2) that it's visible which companies contribute the most (to reward > their > > >> contributions) > > >> > > >> WDYT? > > >> > > >> Thanks > > >> -Vincent > > >> > > >> On Jan 10, 2011, at 11:02 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi devs and everyone, > > >>> > > >>> Emilie has proposed the following content to be added to the Download > > >> page (http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Download): > > >>> > > >>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Drafts/TextDownload > > >>> > > >>> The idea is twofold: > > >>> 1) to get feedback about what people think about our software. > > >>> 2) some people who download the XWiki software from xwiki.org don't > know > > >> that XWiki SAS has a commercial offerings and could be interested by > it > > >>> > > >>> The pros for the community are: > > >>> 1) XWiki SAS will publish back the result of the feedback it receives > > >> from the download form which will allow us to fine tune and improve > the > > >> software > > >>> 2) XWiki SAS could get more business (from people who want to buy > > >> support, dev work, hosting, etc) which will mean accrued budget for > paying > > >> developers and resources to work on the XWiki project > > >>> > > >>> Note 1: the form would be of course optional > > >>> Note 2: in the future I'd like to see a not for profit foundation to > > >> handle xwiki.org, the xwiki open source project, donations, etc. When > this > > >> happens we could elect from member for the foundation and have the > feedback > > >> form sent to that foundation for example, with members of the > foundation > > >> having access to the data (for example). > > >>> > > >>> WDYT? > > >>> > > >>> Thanks > > >>> -Vincent Massol, acting as both CTO of XWiki SAS and XWiki open > source > > >> developer > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
