On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 16:36, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote: > -0
(was -0 for 1) > > pretty much the same comments as Vincent. Without talking about false > positive there is real bug here and since there is tests to catch them > people should look at them sometimes... > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 15:40, Caleb James DeLisle > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I offered to take over the release since Jerome was unable to do it and >> right now we have 38 test >> failures. >> 16 selenium1 tests, >> 6 selenium2/ui-tests >> 16 webstandards tests. >> >> We have 3 options: >> 1. We can release now and accept bugs in the release. >> 2. We can have volunteers to take over tests and get them passing for >> tomorrow so tomorrow I can >> release. >> 3. We can opt to postpone the release. If I work on these alone I expect it >> to take about 1 week as >> long as nobody commits code which introduces further regressions. >> >> I don't think postponing the release is wise at this point and #2 is >> contingent upon volunteers >> claiming ownership of specific tests so I think #1 is the lesser of the >> evils. >> >> Do I hear any objections/volunteers? >> >> Caleb >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devs mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >> > > > > -- > Thomas Mortagne > -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
