which option are you +1 for? "none of the above" isn't really an option unless you have a plan.
Caleb On 04/28/2011 10:37 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 16:36, Thomas Mortagne > <[email protected]> wrote: >> -0 > > (was -0 for 1) > >> >> pretty much the same comments as Vincent. Without talking about false >> positive there is real bug here and since there is tests to catch them >> people should look at them sometimes... >> >> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 15:40, Caleb James DeLisle >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I offered to take over the release since Jerome was unable to do it and >>> right now we have 38 test >>> failures. >>> 16 selenium1 tests, >>> 6 selenium2/ui-tests >>> 16 webstandards tests. >>> >>> We have 3 options: >>> 1. We can release now and accept bugs in the release. >>> 2. We can have volunteers to take over tests and get them passing for >>> tomorrow so tomorrow I can >>> release. >>> 3. We can opt to postpone the release. If I work on these alone I expect it >>> to take about 1 week as >>> long as nobody commits code which introduces further regressions. >>> >>> I don't think postponing the release is wise at this point and #2 is >>> contingent upon volunteers >>> claiming ownership of specific tests so I think #1 is the lesser of the >>> evils. >>> >>> Do I hear any objections/volunteers? >>> >>> Caleb >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> devs mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thomas Mortagne >> > > > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
