+1 Regards, Sorin B.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) < [email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 01:10, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi devs, > > > > Since a long time ago, the xwiki/1.0 syntax has been deprecated in favor > > of the new rendering engine and the 2.x syntaxes, but this has never been > > declared deprecated formally. We should: > > > > * mark the syntax as deprecated in the UI (like 2.1 was marked > > experimental in the syntax choice dropdown) > > * deprecate classes and methods that deal only with the old syntax > > * push more for migrating all documents to the 2.1 syntax; the biggest > > troublemaker is the statistics application > > > > Here's my +1. > > > > +1 > > > > > > We should also decide on a timeline for the complete removal of the 1.0 > > syntax. Is that something we want to do? Provided we manage to migrate > all > > the official documents and some major contributed applications during the > > 4.x cycle, is XWiki 5.0 a good target? We should package the support for > > xwiki/1.0 as an optional extension installable using the extension > manager, > > so that people can upgrade from older versions. Or we could package just > a > > syntax migrator that can be used for an automatic conversion to a newer > > syntax, without actually providing rendering support for it. > > -- > > Sergiu Dumitriu > > http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ > > ______________________________**_________________ > > devs mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.xwiki.org/**mailman/listinfo/devs< > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs> > > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
