+1

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 15:33, Jean-Vincent Drean <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Denis Gervalle <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 00:10, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi devs,
> >>
> >> Since a long time ago, the xwiki/1.0 syntax has been deprecated in favor
> >> of the new rendering engine and the 2.x syntaxes, but this has never
> been
> >> declared deprecated formally. We should:
> >>
> >> * mark the syntax as deprecated in the UI (like 2.1 was marked
> >> experimental in the syntax choice dropdown)
> >> * deprecate classes and methods that deal only with the old syntax
> >> * push more for migrating all documents to the 2.1 syntax; the biggest
> >> troublemaker is the statistics application
> >>
> >> Here's my +1.
> >>
> >
> > +1
> >
>
> +1
>
> >
> >> We should also decide on a timeline for the complete removal of the 1.0
> >> syntax. Is that something we want to do? Provided we manage to migrate
> all
> >> the official documents and some major contributed applications during
> the
> >> 4.x cycle, is XWiki 5.0 a good target? We should package the support for
> >> xwiki/1.0 as an optional extension installable using the extension
> manager,
> >> so that people can upgrade from older versions. Or we could package
> just a
> >> syntax migrator that can be used for an automatic conversion to a newer
> >> syntax, without actually providing rendering support for it.
> >
> >
> > As soon as we are satisfied with the extension manager, and installing
> the
> > 1.0 syntax could be done simply using it, couldn't we simply properly
> > repackage extensions using the 1.0 syntax to depends on it ? This could
> > permit to remove it earlier from the distribution.
> >
>
> This sounds good.
>
> JV.
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>



-- 
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to