On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: > > On May 6, 2013, at 10:06 AM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On May 6, 2013, at 9:54 AM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On May 6, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I can take care of this (we should maybe add it to the release plan). >>>>> >>>>> Cool. >>>>> >>>>> I agree that it would be a good idea to add it the plan except that I >>>>> think the RM is already tired after a release :) So maybe it's nice if >>>>> someone else can do the upgrade (unless the RM is ok to do it ofc ;)). >>>> >>>> Does not have to be all in one row (it's OK if it's done a few days >>>> after the release) but IMO if we want it to be done for each release >>>> it makes it by definition part of the release and the release manager >>>> would be responsible for it (whether he/she do it or not is another >>>> matter). >>> >>> Actually for me the order should be reversed: >>> * Start by installing RC1 on myxwiki.org to verify stability >>> * Then after a few days release final if ok >>> >>> That would really be using myxwiki.org as it's supposed to be used. >>> >>> Maybe that now we're using EM/DW it's going to be easy enough to do that >>> quickly? >> >> What you suggest is to install a SNAPSHOT which is not very easy or >> natural. > > Nope. I'm proposing to install the RC1 version, not a SNAPSHOT. > >> IMO it's OK to put last released version on myxwiki.org, this >> is validating a released version on a prod server. > > After the fact is too late since if there are problems it means re-releasing > a bug fix release quickly. Of course it's better than not doing anything but > less nice than pushing RC1 releases on myxwiki.org.
OK I think you did not understood what I proposed, where did I said that we should do the upgrade only for final releases ? That's why I did not understood when you talked about "reversed order". > > Thanks > -Vincent > >>> Thanks >>> -Vincent >>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> -Vincent >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi devs, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think we should upgrade myxwiki.org to XWiki 5.0 ASAP. We're supposed >>>>>>> to use myxwiki.org as our test bed for latest versions but we're not >>>>>>> using it enough. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Anyone who some free time/will to help upgrade myxwiki.org to 5.0? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Latest upgrades: >>>>>>> http://myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/XWiki/UpgradesLog >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From what I see Marius did an EM/DW upgrade last time so new upgrades >>>>>>> should be pretty simple. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> -Vincent >>>>>>> .xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
