On May 6, 2013, at 10:33 AM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On May 6, 2013, at 10:06 AM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> On May 6, 2013, at 9:54 AM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On May 6, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I can take care of this (we should maybe add it to the release plan). >>>>>> >>>>>> Cool. >>>>>> >>>>>> I agree that it would be a good idea to add it the plan except that I >>>>>> think the RM is already tired after a release :) So maybe it's nice if >>>>>> someone else can do the upgrade (unless the RM is ok to do it ofc ;)). >>>>> >>>>> Does not have to be all in one row (it's OK if it's done a few days >>>>> after the release) but IMO if we want it to be done for each release >>>>> it makes it by definition part of the release and the release manager >>>>> would be responsible for it (whether he/she do it or not is another >>>>> matter). >>>> >>>> Actually for me the order should be reversed: >>>> * Start by installing RC1 on myxwiki.org to verify stability >>>> * Then after a few days release final if ok >>>> >>>> That would really be using myxwiki.org as it's supposed to be used. >>>> >>>> Maybe that now we're using EM/DW it's going to be easy enough to do that >>>> quickly? >>> >>> What you suggest is to install a SNAPSHOT which is not very easy or >>> natural. >> >> Nope. I'm proposing to install the RC1 version, not a SNAPSHOT. >> >>> IMO it's OK to put last released version on myxwiki.org, this >>> is validating a released version on a prod server. >> >> After the fact is too late since if there are problems it means re-releasing >> a bug fix release quickly. Of course it's better than not doing anything but >> less nice than pushing RC1 releases on myxwiki.org. > > OK I think you did not understood what I proposed, where did I said > that we should do the upgrade only for final releases ? That's why I > did not understood when you talked about "reversed order". Ok so your proposal was to do it after each release (not just final releases). I think it's quite some work so I'd propose that we start by doing it all the time for RC1 releases and then if it works out nicely and we can tune the upgrade process so that it's fast then we could try to do it more, including milestones (but sometimes milestones are not that stable but I agree that if that happens we should fix it, maybe it'll help us achieve better milestone stability ;)). Cool, we agree :) Thanks -Vincent >> Thanks >> -Vincent >> >>>> Thanks >>>> -Vincent >>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> -Vincent >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi devs, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think we should upgrade myxwiki.org to XWiki 5.0 ASAP. We're >>>>>>>> supposed to use myxwiki.org as our test bed for latest versions but >>>>>>>> we're not using it enough. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Anyone who some free time/will to help upgrade myxwiki.org to 5.0? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Latest upgrades: >>>>>>>> http://myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/XWiki/UpgradesLog >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> From what I see Marius did an EM/DW upgrade last time so new upgrades >>>>>>>> should be pretty simple. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> -Vincent >>>>>>>> .xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
