Did you check that a virtual XWikiAllGroup correctly propagates to automatic membership in the XWikiMembersGroup?
On 01/21/2014 12:06 PM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau wrote: > Just to add some precisions: > > = What the migrator do = > 1. Create a group XWikiMemberGroup, with XWikiAllGroup as the first member. > 2. All global users of XWikiAllGroup are put inside XWikiMemberGroup and > removed from XWikiAllGroup. > 3. All rights concerning XWikiAllGroup are changed (ex: "view for > XWikiAllGroup" -> "view for XWikiMemberGroup"). It does not break anything > since XWikiAllGroup is a member of XWikiMemberGroup. > 4. All candidacies (ie: join requests, etc...) are moved form XWikiAllGroup > to XWikiMemberGroup, to be consistent. > > > > > 2014/1/21 Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau <[email protected]> > >> Sergiu: >> Exactly, I don't have to have all global users in the this group. Only >> those who are considered as "members" (ie: they have joined the wiki). >> >> >> 2014/1/21 Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> >> >>> Why not make virtual XWikiAllGroup also contain global users? >>> >>> We can make: >>> >>> xwiki.authentication.group.allgroupimplicit=0 -> no >>> xwiki.authentication.group.allgroupimplicit=1 -> yes, all local users >>> xwiki.authentication.group.allgroupimplicit=2 -> yes, local and global >>> >>> Or do you want to have only some global users, not all of them? >>> >>> On 01/21/2014 11:31 AM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau wrote: >>>> Hi developers! >>>> >>>> In Workspaces, we used to add global users in the XWikiAllGroup page of >>> a >>>> subwiki to indicate that they are members of that wiki. >>>> >>>> Now, we have an option called "user scope", and we can have both global >>> & >>>> local users in a subwiki. That means we have global & local users in >>>> XWikiAllGroup. >>>> >>>> Then, it is a problem because it can not work when XWikiAllGroup is a >>>> virtual group [1]. >>>> >>>> Then, I have proposed to create a new group, called XWikiMemberGroup, >>> that >>>> hold the members of the subwiki. (Note: XWikiAllGroup will be a member >>> of >>>> XWikiMemberGroup, in order to say "a local user is a member"). >>>> >>>> So, I have written a migration (again!) [2], to create the new group >>> with >>>> the current content of XWikiAllGroup. In this migration, I also changes >>> all >>>> existing rights that occur on XWikiAllGroup to make them effective for >>>> XWikiMemberGroup. I did not want to duplicate these rights by just >>> adding >>>> the sames for XWikiMemberGroup. I think it is easier for the user to >>> only >>>> take care of the XWikiMemberGroup. But it looks a bit "magical", and >>> some >>>> people don't like it. >>>> >>>> I would like to have your opinion. >>>> >>>> +1 for adding XWikiMemberGroup and to "migrate" rights (replace all >>> rights >>>> given to XWikiAllGroup by rights given to XWikiMemberGroup). >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Louis-Marie >>>> >>>> >>>> [1] http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-9886 - Enabling virtual >>>> XWikiAllGroup breaks wiki membership >>>> [2] >>> https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/compare/feature-wiki-members - >>>> Git branch for this proposal -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
