2014/1/21 Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> > Did you check that a virtual XWikiAllGroup correctly propagates to > automatic membership in the XWikiMembersGroup? >
No. I will do it ASAP. > > On 01/21/2014 12:06 PM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau wrote: > > Just to add some precisions: > > > > = What the migrator do = > > 1. Create a group XWikiMemberGroup, with XWikiAllGroup as the first > member. > > 2. All global users of XWikiAllGroup are put inside XWikiMemberGroup and > > removed from XWikiAllGroup. > > 3. All rights concerning XWikiAllGroup are changed (ex: "view for > > XWikiAllGroup" -> "view for XWikiMemberGroup"). It does not break > anything > > since XWikiAllGroup is a member of XWikiMemberGroup. > > 4. All candidacies (ie: join requests, etc...) are moved form > XWikiAllGroup > > to XWikiMemberGroup, to be consistent. > > > > > > > > > > 2014/1/21 Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau <[email protected]> > > > >> Sergiu: > >> Exactly, I don't have to have all global users in the this group. Only > >> those who are considered as "members" (ie: they have joined the wiki). > >> > >> > >> 2014/1/21 Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> > >> > >>> Why not make virtual XWikiAllGroup also contain global users? > >>> > >>> We can make: > >>> > >>> xwiki.authentication.group.allgroupimplicit=0 -> no > >>> xwiki.authentication.group.allgroupimplicit=1 -> yes, all local users > >>> xwiki.authentication.group.allgroupimplicit=2 -> yes, local and global > >>> > >>> Or do you want to have only some global users, not all of them? > >>> > >>> On 01/21/2014 11:31 AM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau wrote: > >>>> Hi developers! > >>>> > >>>> In Workspaces, we used to add global users in the XWikiAllGroup page > of > >>> a > >>>> subwiki to indicate that they are members of that wiki. > >>>> > >>>> Now, we have an option called "user scope", and we can have both > global > >>> & > >>>> local users in a subwiki. That means we have global & local users in > >>>> XWikiAllGroup. > >>>> > >>>> Then, it is a problem because it can not work when XWikiAllGroup is a > >>>> virtual group [1]. > >>>> > >>>> Then, I have proposed to create a new group, called XWikiMemberGroup, > >>> that > >>>> hold the members of the subwiki. (Note: XWikiAllGroup will be a member > >>> of > >>>> XWikiMemberGroup, in order to say "a local user is a member"). > >>>> > >>>> So, I have written a migration (again!) [2], to create the new group > >>> with > >>>> the current content of XWikiAllGroup. In this migration, I also > changes > >>> all > >>>> existing rights that occur on XWikiAllGroup to make them effective for > >>>> XWikiMemberGroup. I did not want to duplicate these rights by just > >>> adding > >>>> the sames for XWikiMemberGroup. I think it is easier for the user to > >>> only > >>>> take care of the XWikiMemberGroup. But it looks a bit "magical", and > >>> some > >>>> people don't like it. > >>>> > >>>> I would like to have your opinion. > >>>> > >>>> +1 for adding XWikiMemberGroup and to "migrate" rights (replace all > >>> rights > >>>> given to XWikiAllGroup by rights given to XWikiMemberGroup). > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Louis-Marie > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> [1] http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-9886 - Enabling virtual > >>>> XWikiAllGroup breaks wiki membership > >>>> [2] > >>> https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/compare/feature-wiki-members - > >>>> Git branch for this proposal > > > -- > Sergiu Dumitriu > http://purl.org/net/sergiu > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
