+1 localization day but as a l10n.xwiki.org say in general (improve the wiki itself too)
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 10:51 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Andreea, > > > On 30 Jan 2014 at 10:46:56, Andreea Popescu > ([email protected](mailto:[email protected])) wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> First of all, congrats to everyone. >> >> It would be great if we have a "Testing day" and a "Localization day", >> because, for example, in Romanian the localization is not really great. > > A Localization Improvement Day is a very good idea IMO :) > > I'm less thrilled by the testing day which for me is something that needs to > be done all the time anyway. Not sure what we would on that day that we don't > do normally. There's E) though (Code Coverage Day) which is close to this one > but in a more interesting way IMO since the tests we write stay and don't > need to be done again and again manually. > > Ok let's continue brainstorming on days and since we have a lot we'll then > decide which ones we want to do and when! :) > > Thanks > -Vincent > >> Andreea >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:20 AM, [email protected] wrote: >> >> > Hi devs, >> > >> > We've done one year of BFD on the 5.x cycle and this has allowed us to >> > reach a greater goal: one of having caught up with the number of open bugs. >> > We've first succeeded in closing more bugs than there has been created bugs >> > over a year, then over 2 years, then over 3 years, then over 4 years and >> > we're very close to succeed for the last 1600 days (ie 4.4 years)! :) >> > >> > I'd like to congratulate everyone on this achievement which is really >> > awesome. I don't know a lot of other projects who've had this kind of >> > success so we can be proud of ourselves! >> > >> > Current result can be seen at: >> > http://jira.xwiki.org/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=10352 >> > >> > Note that there are still 357 opened bugs which were created since the >> > beginning of the project. >> > >> > My feeling is that it's hard to keep the sustained pace we've set on the >> > BFD days and I think we need a bit of fresh air. >> > >> > Also now that we've caught up with bugs I believe the most important part >> > is to just try to contain the bug ratio so that we're about even in term of >> > number of new bugs vs umber of bugs we close. If we can achieve this it >> > would already be a very nice success. >> > >> > So what I'm proposing for the 6.x cycle is this: >> > - one week out of 2 we continue doing a BFD >> > - the other week we do a rolling XWiki Day on another activity >> > >> > Here's a list of other activities we could do (first mentioned in this >> > thread: http://markmail.org/message/a5ew5ilbgxvf67lu ): >> > >> > A) Doc Fixing Day: improve xwiki.org >> > B) Deprecation Fixing Day: reduce # of deprecated calls and move code to >> > legacy >> > C) Violation Fixing Dy: reduce # of violations. 12K right now on platform >> > for ex (see >> > http://sonar.xwiki.org/drilldown/issues/org.xwiki.platform:xwiki-platform) >> > D) Javadoc Improvement Day: Add missing javadocs in our code and remove >> > checkstyle excludes >> > E) Code Coverage Day: Add as many tests as possible (unit and functional) >> > to increase the TPC >> > F) Broken Links Day: fix as many broken links as possible on xwiki.org. >> > To find them is easy: we just need to enable the IRC Link Checker botlet >> > and wait on IRC to get them listed! >> > G) Others you would consider interesting? >> > >> > The only constraint for defining a day is that it contains small elements >> > that can be fixed quickly which is the case for the proposals listed above. >> > >> > >> > So what I propose to be precise: >> > - one week out of 2 we do a BFD >> > - the other week we do one of each (A through F). Then once we've done a >> > full round we decide which ones are the best for the project, which ones we >> > want to drop and which ones we want to repeat more often than others. >> > >> > I also propose that the 6th and 13th we still do a BFD and on the 20th of >> > Feb we start doing A, then BFD, then B, etc. >> > >> > WDYT? Any other proposal or better idea? >> > >> > Thanks >> > -Vincent >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > devs mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> devs mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
