Hi, > Note that there are still 357 opened bugs which were created since the > beginning of the project. >
I guess the trouble with the remaining bugs is that they are the hard ones that cannot be fixed in a single day. It looks more like something like a dedicated "bug crunching week" for that would be necessary; at last they seem to need a similar attention as new features might need. > My feeling is that it’s hard to keep the sustained pace we’ve set on the BFD > days and I think we need a bit of fresh air. > > Also now that we’ve caught up with bugs I believe the most important part is > to just try to contain the bug ratio so that we’re about even in term of > number of new bugs vs umber of bugs we close. If we can achieve this it would > already be a very nice success. > > So what I’m proposing for the 6.x cycle is this: > - one week out of 2 we continue doing a BFD > - the other week we do a rolling XWiki Day on another activity > > Here’s a list of other activities we could do (first mentioned in this > thread: http://markmail.org/message/a5ew5ilbgxvf67lu ): > > A) Doc Fixing Day: improve xwiki.org > B) Deprecation Fixing Day: reduce # of deprecated calls and move code to > legacy > C) Violation Fixing Dy: reduce # of violations. 12K right now on platform for > ex (see > http://sonar.xwiki.org/drilldown/issues/org.xwiki.platform:xwiki-platform) > D) Javadoc Improvement Day: Add missing javadocs in our code and remove > checkstyle excludes > E) Code Coverage Day: Add as many tests as possible (unit and functional) to > increase the TPC > F) Broken Links Day: fix as many broken links as possible on xwiki.org. To > find them is easy: we just need to enable the IRC Link Checker botlet and > wait on IRC to get them listed! > G) Others you would consider interesting? > On 01/30/2014 10:37 AM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote: > G.1) Improvements issues closing day I agree this would be important, too. Especially with user interfaces often a "small" improvement helps a lot improving user experience. > G.4) e.x.o cleaning day (marking old extensions as deprecated, writing > documentation, specifying what version the extension is working on, etc. ) > On 01/30/2014 10:40 AM, [email protected] wrote: > This one could be part of the Documentation Fixing Day IMO. Unless if one finds out that an extension does not longer work and instead of making it as deprecated just fixes it. I feel allocation some time to keep extensions up to date and running would be a good thing, because: * most people who start developing code for XWiki start with getting some extension / code snippet etc. and tweak the a little * the code they see there are thus the one that gives them the first impression "how to do things" - if that is outdated code e.g. using deprecated API, this will cause that kind of "old" code to spread around in the user base * if at least some selected part is marked as "up to date" this also gives users who install extensions a better impression about XWiki in general * and aside of that, unlike fixing core bugs, updating extensions is something that even I feel I can do without having my head spin too much. ;) The only downside I see with that is that folks might prefer to update code, however remotely useful, to update the documentation ;) Just for that reason it maybe might be better to distinguish between "xwiki.org Doc fixing" and "extensions cleaning" day. > The only constraint for defining a day is that it contains small elements > that can be fixed quickly which is the case for the proposals listed above. > > > So what I propose to be precise: > - one week out of 2 we do a BFD > - the other week we do one of each (A through F). Then once we’ve done a full > round we decide which ones are the best for the project, which ones we want > to drop and which ones we want to repeat more often than others. > > I also propose that the 6th and 13th we still do a BFD and on the 20th of Feb > we start doing A, then BFD, then B, etc. > > WDYT? Any other proposal or better idea? > > Thanks > -Vincent > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
