I have released the Activiti Application. Can someone create the JIRA project for it please ? Also if you could specify that the reported issues NOT to be assigned automatically to me
Thanks, Sorin B. On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Sorin Burjan <[email protected]>wrote: > I agree, application sounds more appropriate. > I'll wait for its creation. > > Thanks. > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Most of the applications are an integration with something: IRC is >> pircbot integration, presentation is Google HTML5 slides integration, >> scheduler is quartz integration, etc. As long as it provides something >> useful in the XWiki UI, it's an application. >> >> On 01/10/2014 03:46 AM, Sorin Burjan wrote: >> > Hello Clemens, >> > >> > This is a fully fledged integration, which has a pretty solid UI: >> > Integration in the Administration section and also an UI Extension in >> the >> > Applications Panel. So from this point of view, it can be seen as an >> > application. >> > The "integration" dilemma is that it's a bigger application than most of >> > the ones we have on extensions. It integrates another sub-system in the >> > wiki if you'd like to see it that way. >> > So this is why I am not sure which is the best naming convention. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Sorin B. >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Clemens Klein-Robbenhaar < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> >> >>> Actually I am not sure about the JIRA project name. I see 2 possible >> >> names: >> >>> >> >>> 1) Activiti Application >> >>> 2) Activiti Integration (because I see that Vincent has chosen Crash >> >>> Integration for CRaSH) >> >>> >> >>> WDYT ? >> >> >> >> I am not sure what the thing really does, so for me "it depends". ;) >> >> >> >> To be called an application I expect it to be usable "out if the box" >> >> (after some configuration, maybe), so unless your extension really does >> >> that, >> >> for me "Activiti Integration" sounds better, as it has a somewhat lower >> >> expectation >> >> on the UI side. >> >> >> >> In any case I am really interested to see what that thing does; in >> fact I >> >> have heard >> >> several users asking for something like that because they consider it a >> >> very useful extension. >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Clemens >> >> >> >>> >> >>> Regards, >> >>> Sorin B. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Sorin Burjan <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Hello, >> >>>> >> >>>> Last year I worked for my master thesis on a integration between >> XWiki >> >> and >> >>>> Activiti. Activiti is a popular open-source workflow execution >> engine. ( >> >>>> http://activiti.org/) >> >>>> >> >>>> I'd like to commit my work so others can use and improve it. >> >>>> For this, I'd like a repository called application-activiti for the >> >> source >> >>>> code, and also a JIRA project called Activiti Application with the >> key >> >>>> ACTIVITI. >> >>>> >> >>>> Thanks in advance, >> >>>> Sorin B. >> >>>> >> >> -- >> Sergiu Dumitriu >> http://purl.org/net/sergiu >> _______________________________________________ >> devs mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >> > > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
