Hi Sorin, On 20 Feb 2014 at 11:13:18, Sorin Burjan ([email protected](mailto:[email protected])) wrote:
> I have released the Activiti Application. > Can someone create the JIRA project for it please ? > Also if you could specify that the reported issues NOT to be assigned > automatically to me You should check IRC. You already asked there and we (I) replied there :) sburjan: done, see http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XACTIVITII sburjan: you could create a first jira and close it with a fixversion of 1.0 Thanks -Vincent > Thanks, > Sorin B. > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Sorin Burjan wrote: > > > I agree, application sounds more appropriate. > > I'll wait for its creation. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > > > >> Most of the applications are an integration with something: IRC is > >> pircbot integration, presentation is Google HTML5 slides integration, > >> scheduler is quartz integration, etc. As long as it provides something > >> useful in the XWiki UI, it's an application. > >> > >> On 01/10/2014 03:46 AM, Sorin Burjan wrote: > >> > Hello Clemens, > >> > > >> > This is a fully fledged integration, which has a pretty solid UI: > >> > Integration in the Administration section and also an UI Extension in > >> the > >> > Applications Panel. So from this point of view, it can be seen as an > >> > application. > >> > The "integration" dilemma is that it's a bigger application than most of > >> > the ones we have on extensions. It integrates another sub-system in the > >> > wiki if you'd like to see it that way. > >> > So this is why I am not sure which is the best naming convention. > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> > Sorin B. > >> > > >> > > >> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Clemens Klein-Robbenhaar < > >> > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>> Actually I am not sure about the JIRA project name. I see 2 possible > >> >> names: > >> >>> > >> >>> 1) Activiti Application > >> >>> 2) Activiti Integration (because I see that Vincent has chosen Crash > >> >>> Integration for CRaSH) > >> >>> > >> >>> WDYT ? > >> >> > >> >> I am not sure what the thing really does, so for me "it depends". ;) > >> >> > >> >> To be called an application I expect it to be usable "out if the box" > >> >> (after some configuration, maybe), so unless your extension really does > >> >> that, > >> >> for me "Activiti Integration" sounds better, as it has a somewhat lower > >> >> expectation > >> >> on the UI side. > >> >> > >> >> In any case I am really interested to see what that thing does; in > >> fact I > >> >> have heard > >> >> several users asking for something like that because they consider it a > >> >> very useful extension. > >> >> > >> >> Cheers, > >> >> Clemens > >> >> > >> >>> > >> >>> Regards, > >> >>> Sorin B. > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Sorin Burjan > >> >> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>> Hello, > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Last year I worked for my master thesis on a integration between > >> XWiki > >> >> and > >> >>>> Activiti. Activiti is a popular open-source workflow execution > >> engine. ( > >> >>>> http://activiti.org/) > >> >>>> > >> >>>> I'd like to commit my work so others can use and improve it. > >> >>>> For this, I'd like a repository called application-activiti for the > >> >> source > >> >>>> code, and also a JIRA project called Activiti Application with the > >> key > >> >>>> ACTIVITI. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Thanks in advance, > >> >>>> Sorin B. > >> >>>> > >> > >> -- > >> Sergiu Dumitriu > >> http://purl.org/net/sergiu > >> _______________________________________________ > >> devs mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
