On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:03 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On 31 Jul 2014 at 14:08:08, Thomas Mortagne 
> ([email protected](mailto:[email protected])) wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:32 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 29 Jul 2014 at 19:34:50, Sergiu Dumitriu 
>> > ([email protected](mailto:[email protected])) wrote:
>> >
>> >> +1 from me.
>> >>
>> >> It is still being used as the WYSIWYG editor of documents in the
>> >> xwiki/1.0 syntax, also as the WYSIWYG editor used for textarea fields
>> >> displayed by a sheet for 1.0 documents. That could mean a lot of content
>> >> created by old applications, and a lot of long-lived wikis migrated from
>> >> 1.x XWiki instances. Do we want to keep the buggy WYSIWYG editor for
>> >> those, or do we want to give them another push to migrate the documents
>> >> as well?
>> >
>> > Good point, I had forgotten it’s still used by xwiki/1.0 syntax.
>> >
>> > BTW, even though we don’t have docs in xwiki/1.0 syntax anymore in XE we 
>> > still have some in platform:
>> > - xwiki-platform-application-manager-ui
>>
>> > - xwiki-platform-repository-server-ui
>>
>> No this application is not using xwiki/1.0 syntax, it just contain an
>> application manager descriptor.
>
> There’s one doc with xwiki/1.0 syntax:
>
> <xwikidoc>
>   <web>ExtensionCode</web>
>   <name>XWikiApplicationExtensionRepository</name>
>   <language/>
>   <defaultLanguage/>
>   <translation>0</translation>
>   <parent>XAppManager.WebHome</parent>
>   <creator>xwiki:XWiki.Admin</creator>
>   <author>xwiki:XWiki.Admin</author>
>   <customClass/>
>   <contentAuthor>xwiki:XWiki.Admin</contentAuthor>
>   <creationDate>1304955109000</creationDate>
>   <date>1322142794000</date>
>   <contentUpdateDate>1322142794000</contentUpdateDate>
>   <version>1.1</version>
>   <title/>
>   <template/>
>   <defaultTemplate/>
>   <validationScript/>
>   <comment/>
>   <minorEdit>false</minorEdit>
>   <syntaxId>xwiki/1.0</syntaxId>
>

Yes and again this documet is just an application descriptor, it's not
really part of XWiki Repository.

> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>> > I’m still +1 to remove TinyMCE and add explanations on how to add it to 
>> > your instance if you need it.
>> >
>> > What do others think?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > -Vincent
>> >
>> >> On 07/29/2014 07:25 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>> >> > Hi devs,
>> >> >
>> >> > Here’s what I commented on 
>> >> > https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/307 :
>> >> >
>> >> > “
>> >> > Thanks Pascal. I've just noticed that we still bundle TinyMCE in 
>> >> > XWiki's WAR. It was probably left for backward compatibility but since 
>> >> > it's been like 6-7 years that we've dropped it, I believe we could vote 
>> >> > about dropping it from our sources and if someone really needs it 
>> >> > they'll still be able to manually install them in their wikis. I'll 
>> >> > follow up on the devs list, thanks.
>> >> > “
>> >> >
>> >> > WDYT? Are you ok to remove it?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks
>> >> > -Vincent
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs



-- 
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to