+1 to remove as long as the 1.0 documents are still editable in an alternative editor (wiki editor or wysiwyg).
Thanks, Eduard On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:03 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On 31 Jul 2014 at 14:08:08, Thomas Mortagne ([email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])) wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:32 AM, [email protected] wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > On 29 Jul 2014 at 19:34:50, Sergiu Dumitriu ([email protected](mailto: > [email protected])) wrote: > >> > > >> >> +1 from me. > >> >> > >> >> It is still being used as the WYSIWYG editor of documents in the > >> >> xwiki/1.0 syntax, also as the WYSIWYG editor used for textarea fields > >> >> displayed by a sheet for 1.0 documents. That could mean a lot of > content > >> >> created by old applications, and a lot of long-lived wikis migrated > from > >> >> 1.x XWiki instances. Do we want to keep the buggy WYSIWYG editor for > >> >> those, or do we want to give them another push to migrate the > documents > >> >> as well? > >> > > >> > Good point, I had forgotten it’s still used by xwiki/1.0 syntax. > >> > > >> > BTW, even though we don’t have docs in xwiki/1.0 syntax anymore in XE > we still have some in platform: > >> > - xwiki-platform-application-manager-ui > >> > >> > - xwiki-platform-repository-server-ui > >> > >> No this application is not using xwiki/1.0 syntax, it just contain an > >> application manager descriptor. > > > > There’s one doc with xwiki/1.0 syntax: > > > > <xwikidoc> > > <web>ExtensionCode</web> > > <name>XWikiApplicationExtensionRepository</name> > > <language/> > > <defaultLanguage/> > > <translation>0</translation> > > <parent>XAppManager.WebHome</parent> > > <creator>xwiki:XWiki.Admin</creator> > > <author>xwiki:XWiki.Admin</author> > > <customClass/> > > <contentAuthor>xwiki:XWiki.Admin</contentAuthor> > > <creationDate>1304955109000</creationDate> > > <date>1322142794000</date> > > <contentUpdateDate>1322142794000</contentUpdateDate> > > <version>1.1</version> > > <title/> > > <template/> > > <defaultTemplate/> > > <validationScript/> > > <comment/> > > <minorEdit>false</minorEdit> > > <syntaxId>xwiki/1.0</syntaxId> > > > > Yes and again this documet is just an application descriptor, it's not > really part of XWiki Repository. > > > Thanks > > -Vincent > > > >> > I’m still +1 to remove TinyMCE and add explanations on how to add it > to your instance if you need it. > >> > > >> > What do others think? > >> > > >> > Thanks > >> > -Vincent > >> > > >> >> On 07/29/2014 07:25 AM, [email protected] wrote: > >> >> > Hi devs, > >> >> > > >> >> > Here’s what I commented on > https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/307 : > >> >> > > >> >> > “ > >> >> > Thanks Pascal. I've just noticed that we still bundle TinyMCE in > XWiki's WAR. It was probably left for backward compatibility but since it's > been like 6-7 years that we've dropped it, I believe we could vote about > dropping it from our sources and if someone really needs it they'll still > be able to manually install them in their wikis. I'll follow up on the devs > list, thanks. > >> >> > “ > >> >> > > >> >> > WDYT? Are you ok to remove it? > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks > >> >> > -Vincent > > _______________________________________________ > > devs mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > > > -- > Thomas Mortagne > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
