Note that if we don’t want to break backward compatibility we keep the current 
ssx and deprecate it and introduce a new essx one (for extended ssx, or any 
other name…).

Thanks
-Vincent

On 11 Dec 2014 at 10:54:46, [email protected] 
([email protected](mailto:[email protected])) wrote:

> Hi Guillaume,
>  
> This is not a domain I know well so maybe what I’ll say is not correct.. :)  
>  
> What about keeping the exact same xobject structure as now but instead of 
> considering the content of the textarea to be plain text we consider it to be 
> wiki syntax that is rendered using our plaintext renderer.  
>  
> This would allow use to use any more (including the {{velocity}} macro, 
> {{include}} macro, etc) but it also allows us to introduce some new {{less}} 
> macro that would preprocess its content and generate CSS.  
>  
> This would also allow us to remove the “parse” option which tells us if we 
> run velocity or not (this is actually bad since we may want to run ruby, 
> python, groovy, etc).  
>  
> WDYT?  
>  
> Thanks  
> -Vincent
>  
> On 11 Dec 2014 at 10:20:49, Guillaume Louis-Marie Delhumeau 
> ([email protected](mailto:[email protected])) wrote:
>  
> > Hi.
> >
> > Since the beginning of the week, I am working to have the LESS
> > pre-processor inside our Skin Extension objects (see:
> > http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-10708). It would enable us to use the
> > Flamingo Theme variables and all bootstrap's mixins inside SSX (see
> > http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-11374).
> > Example of use-case: http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-11408 (Menu
> > Application: Improve default look to make it better-looking with the
> > Flamingo skin).
> >
> > I have created a design page there for the details:
> > http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/LESSModuleImprovements
> >
> > I propose to add a new property inside the XWiki.StyleSheetExtension class
> > which will be called "CSS preprocessor". The actual possible values would
> > be "LESS" or "none", but in the future we can imagine having "SASS" or
> > anything else. Then I propose to change the actual SSX action to perform a
> > LESS compilation if needed. Note that the user would still be able to use
> > or not Velocity in addition of the CSS preprocessor.
> >
> > The other possibilities (that are not part of this proposal) are to create
> > a new XWiki.LESSStyleSheetExtension and a new LSSX action which would
> > behave exactly as the previous objet and action, or to have the ability to
> > choose the processor directly inside the SSX content, with a special line
> > like "# preprocessor = less" or something like that.
> >
> > I have made a prototype that is working (
> > https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/tree/feature-less-ssx) and I am
> > taking care of the compatibility with older skins that do not use LESS
> > (Colibri for instance).
> >
> > Here is my +1. I would like to commit it today to have it in 6.4M2. I have
> > done a lot of refactoring on the LESS module (with a better cache system
> > among other things) that I don't want to commit in a release candidate.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --
> > Guillaume Delhumeau ([email protected])
> > Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
> > Committer on the XWiki.org project
> > _______________________________________________
> > devs mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to