Hi devs, As part of http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-11905, Edy has started using the Java @Priority annotation.
This seems very good and I personally didn’t know about this annotation before (maybe it’s been introduced not that long ago?). So for me it raises the question of: do we want to use this annotation more and how does it compare with what we’ve done so far. I can think of a few places that could have used it: * Macros.get/setPriority(). It should be possible to add support for @Priority and modify MacroTransformation to use that annotation. * Transformations. We have a jira issue opened for adding support for Priority in Transformation’s executions (in TransformationManager). * @DisposePriority (used by ECM). * TranslationBundle.get/setPriority() * … and probably some other places… However, I think there’s a namespacing problem. For example imagine that we code a Macro and set @Priority on that Macro component. The ECM could interpret it as a dispose priority while the MacroTransformation could interpret it as an execution priority… Globally I think that use an annotation for expressing priority is great and much better than what we’ve done in the past with get/setPriority() methods. It’s better because priority is not a business concept and we’re polluting the business interface with it. Now, in order to fix the namespacing issue, I think that the best solution is that each module requiring some priority should introduce its own annotation and should NOT depend on the @Priority one from the JDK (i.e. we ban the usage of it). WDYT? Thanks -Vincent W _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
