+1 for 5 for reasons already mentioned and because I find it to be the most natural.
Thanks, Eduard On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Gabriela Smeria <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks for your effort, Caty! > > - Solution1: I think in order to see the tree, there are required a > minimum number of clicks and this solution clearly doesn’t cover this > condition > - Solution2: it seems a bit hidden, IMO and also too many clicks, as > Sol1 > - Solution3: is a very good idea, but is not sufficient and also a bit > hidden > - Solution4: is too crowded, IMO a breadcrumb should be as simpler as it > can be > - Solution5: this is the best solution from my point of view, because it > also preserves the old breadcrumb and it adds a new element, with a > “home” > icon which I think is intuitive enough > - Solution6: same as Sol3 - really nice to have, but not sufficient > > As a conclusion, my choice will be a combination between 3 and 5, or 5 and > 6. > > Thanks, > > Gabriela > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
