Hi, Some summary of the expressed opinions:
Sol1: -0 (GD), -0 (Vincent), -0 (Gabi), +0 (Caty) Sol2: -0 (GD), -1 (Vincent), -0 (Gabi), +1 (Caty) Sol3: +0 (GD), -0 (Vincent), +0 (Gabi), +0 (Caty) Sol4: -1 (GD), +1 (Vincent), -0 (Gabi), -1 (Caty) Sol5: +1 (GD), +1 (Vincent), +1 (Gabi), +0 (Caty), +1 (Eduard) Sol6: +0 (GD), +0 (Vincent), +0 (Gabi), +1 (Caty) So currently the proposal that have the most positive feedback are: Sol5 and Sol6. Thanks, Caty On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Eduard Moraru <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for 5 for reasons already mentioned and because I find it to be the most > natural. > > Thanks, > Eduard > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Gabriela Smeria <[email protected] > > > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Thanks for your effort, Caty! > > > > - Solution1: I think in order to see the tree, there are required a > > minimum number of clicks and this solution clearly doesn’t cover this > > condition > > - Solution2: it seems a bit hidden, IMO and also too many clicks, as > > Sol1 > > - Solution3: is a very good idea, but is not sufficient and also a bit > > hidden > > - Solution4: is too crowded, IMO a breadcrumb should be as simpler as > it > > can be > > - Solution5: this is the best solution from my point of view, because > it > > also preserves the old breadcrumb and it adds a new element, with a > > “home” > > icon which I think is intuitive enough > > - Solution6: same as Sol3 - really nice to have, but not sufficient > > > > As a conclusion, my choice will be a combination between 3 and 5, or 5 > and > > 6. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Gabriela > > _______________________________________________ > > devs mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
