Hello, on my side I would say: 1.1 : -1 1.2 : +1 1.3 : +0 A : -0 B : +1 C : +1 D : +1
2015-10-01 16:58 GMT+01:00 Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > 1.2: +1 > A: +1 > B: +1 > C: +1 but we need to make sure the print.css is properly declared in the > <head> tag > D: +0 > > There was also an idea from Vincent, about hiding Viewers when extradoc > tabs is displayed. This is an interesting idea, the only problem is that I > would prefer the tabs to be less and less displayed, so this means we would > need the menu. > > Regarding 1.3, I think there are too many entries in the menu. > > Thanks, > Caty > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > With 7.2, the content menus have changed a lot. The pain point is that we > > have a too much crowded "more actions" menu. > > > > Some discussions have already been done on this jira issue: > > http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-12587 > > > > Caty have created a design page to re-organize the menus: > > http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/NestedMenuReorganization > > > > I'm in favor of the solution 1.2. > > > > So: > > > > * -0 for solution 1.1 since the viewers are not what we use the most > > (thanks to the extra tabs on the bottom) and it gives them too much > > importance > > * +1 for solution 1.2, even if we might encounter some difficulties > saying > > if an item is a base action or an advanced one. > > > > * 0 for option A (too much clicks), but on the other hand I don't have an > > alternative to propose. > > * +1 for option B. The jira issue is already created ( > > http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-12636) and I think nobody would be > > opposed to this. > > * +0 for option C. The browser already have this ability, and yes, it > > implies the hiding of the panels (thanks to some CSS we have). However, I > > remember a client using this feature for a convoluted use-case: include a > > light wiki page in an other website via an iframe. Anyway, we could still > > keep the viewer but remove the link. > > * +1 for D. I know that security through obscurity is not the best, but > it > > disturbs me to let an access to the source code of any wiki page, > including > > not-well-done applications created by users. > > > > Thanks, > > Guillaume > > > > > > -- > > Guillaume Delhumeau ([email protected]) > > Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS > > Committer on the XWiki.org project > > _______________________________________________ > > devs mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- *Yacine KEBIR* Web Designer / Front End Developer [email protected] *Mobile: *+213 550 749 033 *Web Site : *www.xwiki.com _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
