+1 for extracting it. We currently need this in the administration module, for the template provider UI.
IMO, xwiki-platform-tree is basically about the tree widget... almost nothing to do with XWiki's data model. In my eyes, this looks like the technology, not the domain. xwiki-platform-index makes much more sense to me, since it defines the domain, which can present an index of documents using various technologies: livetable (documents), tree (documentTree), intepretive dance, etc. +1 for proposal 2 (since we agreed that we were grouping modules by domain and not by technology). Thanks, Eduard P.S.: We could also extract an xwiki-platform-index-livetable (or something with -macro-document if we want to make it about the name of the macro instead of the presentation technology) for the Documents macro (XWiki.DocumentsMacro), currently also bundled in index-ui. On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 3:25 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi devs, > > I see that the DocumentTree macro is used more and more in several places > (as it should) and I’d like to propose to extract the DocumentTree macro > from the Index App. > > Proposal 1: > =========== > > xwiki-platform-tree > |_ xwiki-platform-tree-generic > |_ ... > |_ xwiki-platform-tree-document > |_ ... > > > Proposal 2: > =========== > > xwiki-platform-index > |_ xwiki-platform-index-ui > |_ xwiki-plarform-index-tree > |_ … > > WDYT? Any other proposal? > > Personally I prefer proposal 1. > > Thanks > -Vincent > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
