Hi,

It would be really nice to get some more feedback on this, since we need it
for 7.3M2 (to fix the failing tests).

Thanks,
Eduard

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Eduard Moraru <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 for extracting it. We currently need this in the administration module,
> for the template provider UI.
>
>
> IMO, xwiki-platform-tree is basically about the tree widget... almost
> nothing to do with XWiki's data model. In my eyes, this looks like the
> technology, not the domain.
>
> xwiki-platform-index makes much more sense to me, since it defines the
> domain, which can present an index of documents using various technologies:
> livetable (documents), tree (documentTree), intepretive dance, etc.
>
>
> +1 for proposal 2 (since we agreed that we were grouping modules by domain
> and not by technology).
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Eduard
>
>
> P.S.: We could also extract an xwiki-platform-index-livetable (or
> something with -macro-document if we want to make it about the name of the
> macro instead of the presentation technology) for the Documents macro
> (XWiki.DocumentsMacro), currently also bundled in index-ui.
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 3:25 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> I see that the DocumentTree macro is used more and more in several places
>> (as it should) and I’d like to propose to extract the DocumentTree macro
>> from the Index App.
>>
>> Proposal 1:
>> ===========
>>
>> xwiki-platform-tree
>>   |_ xwiki-platform-tree-generic
>>     |_ ...
>>   |_ xwiki-platform-tree-document
>>     |_ ...
>>
>>
>> Proposal 2:
>> ===========
>>
>> xwiki-platform-index
>>   |_ xwiki-platform-index-ui
>>   |_ xwiki-plarform-index-tree
>>     |_ …
>>
>> WDYT? Any other proposal?
>>
>> Personally I prefer proposal 1.
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent
>> _______________________________________________
>> devs mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to