Hi,

I also didn't understood what 'Project' is about and means.

To be honest I don't think e.x.o is the right place for it.
IMO we should keep e.x.o just for installable extensions that can be used
with Extension Manager.

From what I remember we will want to remove snippets from e.x.o, so not
sure why we should add now the concept of 'project'.

Our projects are listed in http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Forge

Thanks,
Caty


On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> > On 06 Jun 2016, at 11:20, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On 06 Jun 2016, at 11:00, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>> Hi Thomas,
> >>>
> >>>> On 06 Jun 2016, at 10:44, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi xwikiers,
> >>>>
> >>>> I just introduced a "Project" extension type on
> http://extensions.xwiki.org.
> >>>>
> >>>> I needed a place to put a few words about OpenId Connect in general,
> >>>> the goal of the project, the various modules and what is common
> >>>> between them, etc. It's also the parent space of the actual
> >>>> extensions. It does not shows up in Extension Manager of course.
> >>>>
> >>>> See
> http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/OpenID+Connect/
> >>>>
> >>>> WDYT ?
> >>>
> >>> As a user I don’t think I’ll understand what “Project” means. Actually
> even as a dev, I don’t really. I guess you mean it as a container for other
> extensions.
> >>
> >> All those extensions are part of the same project, released together,
> >> have the same bug tracker et source repository so "even as a dev, I
> >> don’t really" might be a little bit exaggerated :)
> >
> > The reason I said project wasn’t clear even for devs is because exo is
> not about development of extensions; it’s about using binaries.
> >
> > In a dev context project makes sense but in a runtime context, it
> doesn’t really. You don’t install a project and you don’t consider binaries
> to be a project. The goal of a project is to create something; it’s a work
> in progress.
> >
> > You do install a Product so that might be a better word but it looks too
> big.
> >
> > I still find “Group” the best work proposed so far.
>
> s/work/word ;)
>
> -Vincent
>
> >
> > Let’s see what others think.
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Vincent
> >
> >> I think “Group” would make more sense.
> >>
> >> "Group" could be usefull for other use cases but it's really not
> >> strong enough here. The goal is not to group some random independent
> >> extensions but to document a project which have a goal and produced
> >> various installable extensions to achieve this goal.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> WDYT?
> >>>
> >>> In any case, we need a legend somewhere to explain the types.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> -Vincent
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Thomas Mortagne
>
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to