Hello Paul, 2016-09-02 11:00 GMT+02:00 Paul Libbrecht <[email protected]>:
> Hello Guillaume, > > > Guillaume Delhumeau <mailto:[email protected]> > > 29 August 2016 at 11:03 > > Paul, your comment makes me think about https://xkcd.com/927/ :) > Good point! > Let's drive this quietly indeed. > > > > Now, as far as I can see, all the previous attempts where made by > > individuals. Nothing have been really discussed and designed by the whole > > team. Which is why I believe this new attempt could be the good one. > Agree. > > Moreover, Vincent is not starting form scratch but on the Fabio's > project. > On a language that I find largely inferior to the previous one since > it's whitespace dependent as Python is which all developers I met find > very doubtful. But well... that's personal. > > We only need to make some improvements on it. > > > > About my expectations: > > > > * I need a format that gives the same result when I export my content > > after > > having imported it (bijection). > Please clarify here: do you need that for all projects of everyone of > just for the projects you intend to work with? > Of course, only on the projects that I work with. And for the projects where people who think like me will work with. And I can potentially work on every project that is currently hosted on xwiki-contrib... It's not only about my usage, but about general best practices that we want to enforce/encourage. > (that relates to the claim that we can have "source and push" projects > to be different form "source bijection wiki") > > * I would prefer having it respecting the Nested Page hierarchy (ie: no > > space concept). > > * Easy to edit with whatever text editor. Maybe using a correct suffix to > > enable the syntax highlighting easily: for example I usually edit my > > content inside a file holding the ".vm" extension so my editor knows I > > will > > write some Velocity code in it. > +1 > I also claim that freedom in the extensions is better. > > I never write code from scratch in my file system. But if I had to, I > > suppose the hierarchy that Vincent suggests would be too complex. It > might > > be a problem for the developers who have written XFF and the NodeJs tools > > which have code to be imported in XWiki, but does not have output filter > > now. > So you want freedom in the directory layout? > No. I just hope that the directory structure will not be too difficult to work with from scratch. > This might make sense to join to other build systems btw... (e.g. the > package task that includes a JS compilation or some documentation > generation). > > Paul > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > Thanks, -- Guillaume Delhumeau ([email protected]) Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS Committer on the XWiki.org project _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
