Vincent Massol wrote: > So I guess what I’m saying is that for me what would help the most the > current workflow used by the xwiki core dev team is: > * the introduction of the xar:fetch and xar:deploy mojos > * the validation (to help prevent mistakes) > * the extraction of the attachments as standard files on the file system so > that they can be replaced easily Plus at least extract the JS-extensions and CSS-extensions as JS and CSS files at least or?
And the same holds for velocity and groovy code or? But here, I cannot find a way that would make it clear that a given object property or page content is in velocity, groovy, or xxxx. Is there a way? Paul PS: while it seems like there's been rules set so that one shouldn't fiddle the XML to break XAR parsing, I am really surprised that there's not been rules defined to avoid gross JS, CSS, velocity, or groovy errors. Is that true? _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
