Hi, What about "Standard XWiki Flavor"? I think it was mentioned in previous discussions.
It`s basically what you get when you download. Once you start customizing or installing some other Flavor, it`s no longer "standard". That and the fact that we used to have, in older versions, a packaging (for the xar or war module, don`t remember) that featured "standard" in it`s name. Thanks, Eduard On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea < mariusdumitru.flo...@xwiki.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Guillaume Delhumeau < > guillaume.delhum...@xwiki.com> wrote: > > > +1 for Classic > > > > Classic sounds good. +1 > > > > > > 2017-05-24 14:16 GMT+02:00 Olivier Seres <ose...@xwiki.com>: > > > > > I m also in flavor of Classic Flavor for 3 reasons : > > > For the last 10 years, it was THE (only one) proposed flavor, now we > > might > > > have more than one > > > There is "Class" in classic , sound positive to me > > > It has a distinguishable name > > > > > > I find "xwiki flavour" confusing ( it implies that other flavors are > > > non-xwiki ones...) > > > > > > Olivier Sérès > > > > > > > Le 24 mai 2017 à 14:03, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.morta...@xwiki.com> > a > > > écrit : > > > > > > > >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <ser...@xwiki.org> > > > wrote: > > > >>> On 05/24/2017 05:51 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: > > > >>> Hi devs, > > > >>> > > > >>> I'm getting closer to finish with the hard work around new platform > > > >>> flavor which is going to replace XE. > > > >>> > > > >>> Need to decide what user will see in the Flavor picker when > installed > > > XWiki now. > > > >>> > > > >>> As a reminder we decided that this would be a generic flavor, not > > tied > > > >>> to any specific use case (so forget about "Knwonledge Base Flavor" > > > >>> :)). > > > >>> > > > >>> Here is a few ideas gathered in previous mails: > > > >>> * "XWiki Flavor" > > > >>> * "Default XWiki Flavor" > > > >>> * "Generic XWiki Flavor" > > > >>> * "Base XWiki Flavor" > > > >> > > > >> A few more ideas: > > > >> > > > >> * Classic > > > >> * Raw > > > >> * Starter > > > > > > > > Not a fan or "Raw". > > > > > > > > I like "Classic", might sound better than "Default" for most users. > > > > Not sure about "Starter". > > > > > > > >> > > > >>> "Generic" is probably a way too technical term. > > > >>> > > > >>> "Base" would be misleading IMO since it's not really a base flavor. > > > >>> Its primary goal is not to be used as a dependency (of course it's > > > >>> fine to have it as dependency if you just want to add pre installed > > > >>> extensions to the default flavor). It's a -1 for me. > > > >>> > > > >>> Frankly I would simply go for "XWiki Flavor". I know, it's not > going > > > >>> to be the only flavor for XWiki but it's obvious when you actually > > see > > > >>> severals of those in the picker anyway and I find it nicer than > > > >>> "Default XWiki Flavor" which basically means the same thing since > the > > > >>> XWiki core project does not plan to provide any other flavor. I'm > > also > > > >>> fine with "Default XWiki Favor" if others think it's a better name. > > > >>> > > > >>> WDYT ? > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> Sergiu Dumitriu > > > >> http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Thomas Mortagne > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhum...@xwiki.com) > > Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS > > Committer on the XWiki.org project > > >
