On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 11:25 AM Vincent Massol <vinc...@massol.net> wrote: > > So I’m proposing: > > * Tomcat: latest of debian oldstable/stable/unstable for tomcat 8.x, see > https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=default§ion=all&arch=any&searchon=names&keywords=tomcat8&exact=1 > (in practice that’s 8.0.x and 8.5.x). > > @Thomas: I see that we provide a tomcat7 and tomcat8 packaging for debian. > Should we drop the tomcat7 one? I don’t think we should support it.
Actually I have the need myself (some server stuck on a old Ubuntu 14.04 that I need to migrate) so I'm not going to delete it just yet :) But +1 to officially not support it yes. > > * Jetty: latest of debian oldstable/stable/unstable for jetty 9.x, see > https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=default§ion=all&arch=any&searchon=names&keywords=jetty9&exact=1 > (in practice that’s 9.2.x). NOTE: Strange that “unstable” is lagging behind > so much and that Jetty 9.4.x is not being tested. Anyway it’s easier to > follow the debian repos. > > * Jetty Standaline: latest of Jetty 9.x, (i.e. 9.4.x FROM) > > I’m updating > https://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/ServletContainerSupportStrategy/ > , let me know if you disagree. > > Thanks > -Vincent > > > On 31 Oct 2018, at 10:04, Vincent Massol <vinc...@massol.net> wrote: > > > > Hi devs, > > > > We now have > > https://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/ServletContainerSupportStrategy/ > > but it’s not precise enough. > > > > I’m proposing the following: > > > > * Mention the supported version cycle and mention that we support the > > latest version of the cycle. > > * For Tomcat, I propose to say we support Tomcat 8.x (which means Tomcat > > 8.5.34 as of today, see “latest” tag on https://hub.docker.com/_/tomcat/) > > * For Jetty (standalone packaging or standard), I propose to say we support > > Jetty 9.x (which means Jetty 9.4.12 as of today, see “latest” tag on > > https://hub.docker.com/_/jetty/) > > > > WDYT? > > > > Thanks > > -Vincent > > > > > -- Thomas Mortagne
