We also have the "Idea" issue type in Jira so I don't think we need a
dedicated project just for that. It would be best to find the existing
project that your idea could extend, otherwise the "XWIKI" (platform)
project is still a good fit, IMO, since we should then better determine if
the feature should be a core/platform feature or if it should best be
suited in its own separate extension.

It's easy to build a filter for all the ideas from all the projects we have
on Jira.

Thanks,
Eduard


On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:31 PM Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
vali...@gmail.com> wrote:

> We could install the Ideas app somewhere on design.xwiki.org and make it
> exclusive for listing Extensions ideas.
> Thanks,
> Caty
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:35 AM Thomas Mortagne <
> thomas.morta...@xwiki.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi xwikiers,
> >
> > I'm never sure where to put ideas of extensions I have so I often
> > forget them or details I had tough about or gathered back then.
> >
> > I don't think http://design.xwiki.org is the right place until you
> > really start designing the extension. Also it's too generic for this
> > need and not a very good entry point for searching something IMO, more
> > something to link to from somewhere else.
> >
> > I would prefer something really dedicated to this "that would be a
> > nice thingy but not sure about the details yet" state. Would be a good
> > source for hackathons and GSOC or for contributors who are searching
> > for something interesting to work on.
> >
> > I was thinking about the following alternatives:
> > * a new dedicated project on https://jira.xwiki.org
> > * reuse https://jira.xwiki.org/projects/XCONTRIB after some cleanup
> > (close everything left in it basically) but not super clean (it's just
> > that it's a good name)
> > * some new application on http://www.xwiki.org
> >
> > WDYT ?
> >
> > Right now my preference goes to a clean new jira project (just need to
> > think about a good project id) where you put description and close it
> > when the extension work really start on a dedicated location. Less
> > work and should do the job well.
> >
> > --
> > Thomas Mortagne
> >
>

Reply via email to