On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 6:31 PM Vincent Massol <vinc...@massol.net> wrote: > > Hi Caty, > > Sounds good generally. Some feedback: > > * It seems verbose. I would put a single box for the version. > * Not sure what “installation” is. “Production” and “Demo”? > * I would have an order on the boxes. Production or Demo should come first > for ex. > * If you choose Production then, I would prefill the version with the LTS > version by default.
> * The OS field should be auto-guessed I'm really not sure about this one since it's a server software you rarely want to install it on the OS you are browsing from. > * The packaging will also be defined automatically based on the answer from > installation & OS > * The version should be the last question since the packaging doesn’t depend > on it. Actually it doesn’t even make sense for some packaging such as debian > since you don’t download anything. But I guess the command line we show could > specify the version. > * IMO it’s missing the concept of recommended packaging. So I would make the > defined packaging be the recommended one and make it clear (for ex when you > click the arrow you’ll see “Recommended Packaging” and then below “Other > Packagings”. > > Thanks! > -Vincent > > > On 18 Mar 2019, at 17:59, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <vali...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > Hi Devs, > > > > I'm curious what you think about this direction for the Download / Install > > page on xwiki.org: > > Iteration 1 > > https://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Install/LDJEasierInstallationFlow/WebHome/Iteration1ZIP.png > > > > Changes: > > * Download renamed to Install > > * Form at the beginning to select the version, OS, type and package > > * Depending on the user selection, there is an option to Download the > > package, or you just get Installation steps (personalized for each option > > selected). > > > > I've iterated currently just for the ZIP package (for Demo+Mac), but > > imagine something similar for all the other packages. > > > > What do you think? Should I continue in this direction? > > > > Thanks, > > Caty > -- Thomas Mortagne
