Well done Fawad, congrats! A very small detail: we’re strying to have the same styles for images on xwiki.org and we have some guidelines linked from https://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/WebHome#HDocumenting
For example for images here are the best practices: https://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/DocGuide#HScreenshots2FImages So it would be awesome if you could use the {{image}} macro. Thanks -Vincent > On 16 Jul 2019, at 19:27, Fawad Ali <m.fawaadal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > Hope you are doing wonderful today. > > I am very excited to announce that Interaction Maps Application v1.0 is now > up. > > Extension and documentation: > https://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/InteractiveMapsApplication/ > Forum post: > https://forum.xwiki.org/t/interactive-maps-application-v1-0-released/ > > Thanks to Thomas for helping with issues in the release; Stephane for all > the wonderful and detailed instructions; Ecaterina for all the great help > and ideas; Vincent for helping with tests and other issues; and everyone > else who helped with the project. > It has been a wonderful experience so far to work with the XWiki community! > I look forward to how the complete application will turn out. > > Best, > Fawad > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 1:31 PM Stéphane Laurière <slauri...@xwiki.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Fawad, >> >>> Also, I looked into it and the idea of custom class property for getting >> the location is interesting indeed. I will see how I should prioritize it >> and implement it then since we have other major features to look into. >>> >>> I would also like to ask; what do you foresee as the basic elements of >> the application? We have map configuration, map query, search and filter >> widget, markers and popups so far. Do you have anything other than this in >> mind that could be thought of as the basis of the application? I think we >> should completely stabilize the basics by the end of this week so I can >> work on other features like map paths, indoor maps and custom shapes. >> >> Just a quick reply about this to confirm that I think the basic elements >> that you mention form the core of version 1.0. I don't have much to add at >> the moment. You're right that it's important to have sound foundations and >> we should limit future modifications of the core as much as possible, >> however despite anticipating the best we can, we may encounter the need to >> modify it at some point, let's see... >> >> I saw you were facing issues with the release and the signing part, I hope >> we'll manage to solve them with the help of the community. Let's continue >> the discussion until we find a fix.. >> >> Cheers >> >> Stéphane >> >> >> >>
