Hi everyone, Hope all of you are all right. I am working on the implementation of Indoor Maps. For that, there are several options for adaptation. So I need your suggestions. The first question is how would the users be using the indoor maps? - Would they be using images for each level? - Would they prefer to have a normal map and add shape-like objects to it? - Or would they like a mixture of both i.e. a normal map with images as levels?
For a normal map with multilevel structures - we can use https://github.com/cbaines/leaflet-indoor For using only images - we can make use of https://leafletjs.com/examples/crs-simple/crs-simple.html What do you think would be best considering the map's user base? Best, Fawad On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 5:53 PM Fawad Ali <m.fawaadal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I wanted to ask if it was possible to have a custom class sheet and the > editing options of a normal page available at the same time? > As it stands, for the PointSheet, we will have to skip the WYSIWYG editor > for editing the page. However, one thing could be that instead of taking > the page's content for the Point's popup, we could introduce a new class > property popupContent and have the popup content inside that. This way, we > can use WYSIWYG as well. > > Another approach could be to keep the current Point Editor and use that > create points without any sheet. > > The same questions apply for the Shape Editor as well. > What do you think? > > Best, > Fawad > > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 2:53 PM Fawad Ali <m.fawaadal...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Stéphane, >> >> Yes, sure. >> In the meantime, I will be working on the PointSheet. >> However, I do want to ask if the Shape Editor is necessary at this point >> if we are going with GeoJSON. We can refer the user to http://geojson.io >> for creating the features. What do you think? >> >> Best, >> Fawad >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 12:04 PM Stéphane Laurière <slauri...@xwiki.com> >> wrote: >> >>> OK Fawad, >>> >>> Meantime since Caty is off, and since today might actually be a bit >>> early for me I'm afraid, I'd propose we have the call on Monday 15:00 UTC >>> on Monday if that's ok with you . >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Stéphane >>> >>> >>> Fawad Ali: >>> > Stéphane, Ecaterina, >>> > >>> > About the call, I think we should have it so that we all converge on >>> the things to be done. >>> > However, tomorrow (Friday), I have a call with the Pakistan's GSoC >>> community at about 5 PM UTC. If the call will be finished in two hours I am >>> fine with it or we could reschedule it to 2:30 PM UTC or else Monday. >>> > >>> > Best, >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Stéphane Laurière >>> XWiki – https://xwiki.com >>> >>>
