Am Donnerstag, den 11.10.2012, 05:15 +1100 schrieb Dmitry Smirnov:
> Dear team,
>
> Please find attached patches for licensecheck ('jessie' branch).
> I expect them to be self-explanatory but if any doubts I'll be happy to
> answer
> your questions.Thanks. I applied patches 2, 4, and 5. For patch 4 I removed print-defaults and tests from the GetOptions line. For patch 5 I modified the indentation of the return statement and let the comment begin with an capital letter. Re code style: How should values assigned: "x = 5" or "x=5"? Patch 1 and 3 look good. Before applying, I like to see the files that triggers the wrong result fixed by these patches. > Shall we change license names for compliance with > copyright-format-1.0: > > "BSD (3 clause)" --> "BSD-3-clause" > "GPL (v2 or later)" --> "GPL-2+" > etc.? > I hope everybody would agree with that. Using the names from the copyright-format-1.0 sounds a good idea. What do the other devscripts maintainer think? -- Benjamin Drung Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devscripts-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devscripts-devel
