On Mon, 2016-03-07 at 21:44 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > For source history, "gbp inport-dscs --debsnap" gives you access to real > "git bisect" access. So no point reinvention it in debsnap itself.
I wasn't aware of that, thanks for the tip. > (Yes, I am living in high bandwidth region.) Yeah, for me that would be a prohibitive exercise. I can't imagine how Joey Hess would use that ;) > For binary package history checking, dependency etc. matters and most > likely needs your manual attention. At least with the new --list option > printing out sorted list of versions, you can do bisect like action > manually whice checking dependencyetively recent versions. I don't see any --list option in the debsnap in unstable. pabs@chianamo ~ $ debsnap --binary --list libc6 Unknown option: list ... I would really like to see a general bisect tool that could wrap debsnap and other bisect situations. This can be hacked around using a fake git repo and git bisect though, so once debsnap --list is available that should be enough. > Do you still think we should add complexities into debsnap? No. Please close this bug with the upload that adds debsnap --list. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devscripts-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devscripts-devel
