Hi, On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 10:17:58AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, 2016-03-07 at 21:44 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > > For source history, "gbp inport-dscs --debsnap" gives you access to real > > "git bisect" access. So no point reinvention it in debsnap itself. > > I wasn't aware of that, thanks for the tip. > > > (Yes, I am living in high bandwidth region.) > > Yeah, for me that would be a prohibitive exercise. > > I can't imagine how Joey Hess would use that ;)
Then try --list approach in few weeks. > > For binary package history checking, dependency etc. matters and most > > likely needs your manual attention. At least with the new --list option > > printing out sorted list of versions, you can do bisect like action > > manually whice checking dependencyetively recent versions. > > I don't see any --list option in the debsnap in unstable. Oh, that is pending upload feature :-) I just coded it. > pabs@chianamo ~ $ debsnap --binary --list libc6 > Unknown option: list > ... > > I would really like to see a general bisect tool that could wrap > debsnap and other bisect situations. > > This can be hacked around using a fake git repo and git bisect though, > so once debsnap --list is available that should be enough. > > > Do you still think we should add complexities into debsnap? > > No. > > Please close this bug with the upload that adds debsnap --list. OK. _______________________________________________ devscripts-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devscripts-devel
