*** From dhcp-server -- To unsubscribe, see the end of this message. ***
Is this correct/possible?
shared-network MYNET {
deny unknown-clients;
subnet 172.21.16.0 netmask 255.255.252.0 {
option broadcast-address 172.21.19.255;
option routers 172.21.16.1;
}
subnet 172.21.20.0 netmask 255.255.252.0 {
option broadcast-address 172.21.23.255;
option routers 172.21.20.1;
}
subnet 172.16.16.0 netmask 255.255.252.0 {
option broadcast-address 172.16.19.255;
option routers 172.16.16.1;
}
subnet 172.20.20.0 netmask 255.255.252.0 {
option broadcast-address 172.20.23.255;
option routers 172.20.20.1;
}
}
group {
pool {
range 172.21.16.2 172.21.19.254;
range 172.21.20.2 172.21.23.254;
}
host PC1 {
hardware ethernet 00:c0:f0:f0:ab:c1;
filename "config-PC1";
}
host PC2 {
hardware ethernet 00:c0:f0:f0:ab:c5;
filename "config-PC2";
}
}
group {
pool {
range 172.16.16.2 172.16.19.254;
range 172.16.20.2 172.16.23.254;
}
host PC3 {
hardware ethernet 00:c0:f0:f0:ab:d3;
}
host PC4 {
hardware ethernet 00:c0:f0:f0:ab:d1;
}
}
The desired effect is that a known host with a given MAC address will be
assigned an address from one of two pools. One pool requires a boot file,
the other does not. All subnets exist on the same physical interface. I
also would be using version 2 of the DHCPd.
Please, can someone verify this, or point out any obvious problems.
Thanks in advance.
Roderick B. Greening, BSc. |
Network Specialist | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cable Atlantic Inc. |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit http://www.fugue.com/dhcp/lists
If you are without web access, or if you are having trouble with the web page,
please send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please try to use the web
page first - it will take a long time for your request to be processed by hand.
Archives for this mailing list are available at
http://www.webnology.com/list-archives/dhcp/dhcp-server
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
