On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Arjan J. Molenaar wrote:
> > BTW what's the status of the GnomeCanvas in this matter? If it could be
> > done by just placing the GnomeCanvas in GTK+ (without stuff that needs
> > extra libs, like an image object) it's a good start. Then the canvas
> > could be a specialization of GnomeCanvas aiming for diagramming.
>
> Well, the whole reason we're doing this is because we don't like some
> stuff in the GnomeCanvas, pretty silly to base ones work on it then.
Not that we aren't going to steal all the good ideas from it though :)
The GnomeCanvas's basic assumptions are different than what we want to
work with.
>
> / Alex
>
>
James.
--
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.daa.com.au/~james/
