Steve,
You are correct in your observation "This makes the numbers pretty outdated". 
The US started changing its policies 2004 when
we democrats took over more of the legislative process. The numbers started 
changing significantly. The Petroleum Institute has some very
different numbers for the same time period covered by Pimentel & Pimentel's 
book. It seems Pimentel & Pimentel's book makes some 
assumptions that do not support the facts. Also they do not agree on what is a 
tax detectable cost. Pimentel & Pimentel's book lists
as subsidies items the Petroleum Industry lists a tax deductible expenses. I 
really do not wish to defend IRS tax regulations as to which are
legitimate deductions for cost of which are "subsidies".

B


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Steve Verhey 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 1:30 PM
  Subject: Re: [Digestion] Biogas conversation rates



  Regarding subsidies in the US: here is information from Table 22.3 in 
Pimentel & Pimentel's book Food, Energy, and Society, 3rd edition:

  energy source/subsidy (in billion $)

  Oil/11.9
  Nuclear/11.0
  Coal/8.0
  Natural gas/4.3
  Energy efficiency/1.2
  Ethanol/ >1.0

  The oil and ethanol subsidy data are from 2001 sources; other industry data 
are from 1993. This makes the numbers pretty outdated, but I think the point is 
clear: oil companies get plenty of help to harvest "free in the ground" oil. It 
follows that the price of petroleum energy is artificially low (the "natural" 
price would be the cost of goods sold + distribution + profit margin). I don't 
think these numbers include the cost to taxpayers of maintaining the kind of 
military necessary to defend oil sources and shipping routes.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:15:28 -0800
  From: [email protected]
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: [Digestion] Biogas conversation rates


  On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:04 PM, bingham <[email protected]> wrote:

      
    subsidized grains....under cut the production of corn ???? I would like to 
see the evidence of a subsidized grain effecting the production of corn in a 
third world setting. Most third world farmers, only cost, is the seed. Rain is 
free and the grass is free, to feed there beasts of burden is free. They do not 
use energy.

  Your logic is a bit tricky to follow, but here's something to ponder in 
relation to your notion that agriculture in the third world is (nearly) free 
and does not use energy.

  -----Forwarded Message----- 
  From: Earth Policy Release 
  Sent: Jan 14, 2011 2:00 AM 
  To: [email protected] 
  Subject: Earth Policy Release -- The Great Food Crisis of 2011 

       
        THE GREAT FOOD CRISIS OF 2011* 
        By Lester R. Brown 
        www.earth-policy.org/plan_b_updates/2011/update90

       Earth Policy Release     
        Plan B Update     
        January 14, 2011    


       
        As the new year begins, the price of wheat is setting an all-time high 
in the United Kingdom. Food riots are spreading across Algeria. Russia is 
importing grain to sustain its cattle herds until spring grazing begins. India 
is wrestling with an 18-percent annual food inflation rate, sparking protests. 
China is looking abroad for potentially massive quantities of wheat and corn. 
The Mexican government is buying corn futures to avoid unmanageable tortilla 
price rises. And on January 5, the U.N. Food and Agricultural organization 
announced that its food price index for December hit an all-time high.

        But whereas in years past, it's been weather that has caused a spike in 
commodities prices, now it's trends on both sides of the food supply/demand 
equation that are driving up prices. On the demand side, the culprits are 
population growth, rising affluence, and the use of grain to fuel cars. On the 
supply side: soil erosion, aquifer depletion, the loss of cropland to nonfarm 
uses, the diversion of irrigation water to cities, the plateauing of crop 
yields in agriculturally advanced countries, and—due to climate change 
—crop-withering heat waves and melting mountain glaciers and ice sheets. These 
climate-related trends seem destined to take a far greater toll in the future.

       



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Digestion mailing list

  to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
  [email protected]

  to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
  
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/digestion_lists.bioenergylists.org

  for more information about digestion, see
  Beginner's Guide to Biogas
  http://www.adelaide.edu.au/biogas/
  and the Biogas Wiki http://biogas.wikispaces.com/

_______________________________________________
Digestion mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/digestion_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more information about digestion, see
Beginner's Guide to Biogas
http://www.adelaide.edu.au/biogas/
and the Biogas Wiki http://biogas.wikispaces.com/

Reply via email to