Actually greenhouse gases have been 10 to 20 times higher in earth's history with NO CORRELATION to climate change. This empirical evidence destroys the whole premise of the alarmists. Thus, "major past climate changes were either uncorrelated with changes in CO2 or were characterized by temperature changes that preceded changes in CO2 by hundreds to thousands of years." Testimony of Richard S. Lindzen, MIT, former chairman of NAS Climate Change Panel, before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee on May 2. 2001. [Citations from peer-reviewed studies available on request].
We should never confuse our business with the contentious policy debate on this subject. If we do, we will be discredited. There are dozens of good reasons for diversifying the energy supply and reducing the dependence on fossil fuels. Unless you are a lobbyist, you really don't need to address them one way or the other. We are in a green business, but it is still a BUSINESS. That's why they call me the "Gordon Gecko of biogas." J Randy Randy M. Mott President CEERES Sp. z o.o. Ul. Postepu 1 02-676 Warsaw +48 22 843 11 22 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] <http://www.ceeres.eu/> www.ceeres.eu From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Awadhoot Bapat Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 2:13 PM To: [email protected]; For Discussion of Anaerobic Digestion Subject: Re: [Digestion] TEDx crowdsourcing/call for abstracts (Steve Verhey) Very well said Paul. Couldn't agree more Avadhut On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Paul Harris <[email protected]> wrote: G'day Marc, I have not read the first post yet (only your quote) but am replying to you off list as I think your response in this case is a bit personal and harsh (But I welcome your other contributions!). I realise it is easy to fire off an e-mail without fully realising the implications, or audience. In our local weather there are long term trends of higher temperatures and lower rainfall, so I am fairly sure the climate is changing. Modelling shows that nature on its own would not have caused this, so I am fairly sure that man is contributing. But my real argument is that "climate change" is a distracting symptom and the real need is to rapidly reduce our use of "natural" resources like fossil fuels and minerals while we still have the option so that our grandchildren will have the means to exist. If we don't slow down our "Growth" there will a catastrophe that makes the Global Financial Crisis pale into insignificance. All the best, HOOROO Mr. Paul Harris, Room 202 Charles Hawker Building, Faculty of Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, PMB 1, Glen Osmond SA 5064 Ph : +61 8 8303 7880 Fax : +61 8 8303 4386 mailto:[email protected] http://www.adelaide.edu.au/directory/paul.harris CRICOS Provider Number 00123M This email message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information that may be confidential and/or copyright. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender by reply email and immediately delete this email. Use, disclosure or reproduction of this email by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. No representation is made that this email or any attachments are free of viruses. Virus scanning is recommended and is the responsibility of the recipient. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of F. Marc de Piolenc Sent: Wednesday, 20 July 2011 8:29 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Digestion] TEDx crowdsourcing/call for abstracts (Steve Verhey) An invitation to mental masturbation. Manmade global warming is a lie. The liars have been caught lying. Get over it. There are plenty of real problems in desperate need of the kind of focus this message is intended to elicit. Marc On 7/20/2011 3:00 AM, [email protected] wrote: > When it comes to energy and global climate change, most > Americans can be loosely grouped into 3 tribes, each well-meaning > in its own way: > > > > Global climate change deniers;Entrepreneurs and others who believe we can innovate our > way out of any problems, and that new energy sources will be found to replace > existing ones as needed, soon;Citizens who are quietly concerned, hoping and trusting > that someone else has the situation under control; some of these citizens are > making personal changes in response to their concerns. > > > > > > > > > What if all three tribes are wrong? Wouldn't it be a good > idea to practice thinking about it? _______________________________________________ Digestion mailing list to Send a Message to the list, use the email address [email protected] to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/digestion_lists.bioenergyli <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/digestion_lists.bioenergyl ists.org> sts.org for more information about digestion, see Beginner's Guide to Biogas http://www.adelaide.edu.au/biogas/ and the Biogas Wiki http://biogas.wikispaces.com/ _______________________________________________ Digestion mailing list to Send a Message to the list, use the email address [email protected] to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/digestion_lists.bioenergyli sts.org for more information about digestion, see Beginner's Guide to Biogas http://www.adelaide.edu.au/biogas/ and the Biogas Wiki http://biogas.wikispaces.com/
_______________________________________________ Digestion mailing list to Send a Message to the list, use the email address [email protected] to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/digestion_lists.bioenergylists.org for more information about digestion, see Beginner's Guide to Biogas http://www.adelaide.edu.au/biogas/ and the Biogas Wiki http://biogas.wikispaces.com/
