I could not care less about the status quo or influence. 

My goal is to improve learning in the world, including literacy, by an order
of magnitude. It can be done, but not if intelligent people jump on ANY new
bandwagon that appears. We need to focus our energies and insist on
empirical information, not vague mostly emotional personal experiences and
arguments. Only one in ten people in the world has internet access, and it
is often marginal at best, No software on the current Internet will solve
the massive problem of adult literacy

I will be happy to send the outline of my new book, and other information,
to interested people. Please write to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . It proposes to solve
the 'education for all' problem with adaptive learning. 



Alfred Bork
University of California, Irvine

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Taran Rampersad
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 10:15 AM
To: The Digital Divide Network discussion group
Subject: Re: [DDN] FW: [NIFL-HEALTH:4627] Adult Literacy education Wiki

Alfred Bork wrote:

>I see no evidence that this will help adult literacy in any large amount.
At
>best it is an unfounded hope.
>  
>
I could have fun with this and say that some hope is based on faith, but
that's not really what this is about. Wikis have had a tangible
influence throughout the world; the era preceding Wikis lacked said
influence.

>Every new idea is seen by some as a solution.
>  
>
And every new idea is seen by everyone as a challenge to the status quo.
Whether people are against change or for change is really the issue.

Take podcasting, as an example. It challenges the status quo. There are
problems with it for the developing world; one is a matter of usability
through access to bandwidth. That's a tangible problem. But is it
worthwhile to address? Certainly. There are problems that need to be
addressed, and even as I have played the part of devil's advocate about
podcasting and mobcasting, it doesn't mean that it isn't a worthwhile
thing to explore. In fact, it has to be explored to gain the evidence to
substantiate either position - optimist or pessimist. And there are ways
around the issue of bandwidth that have nothing to do with bandwidth. By
identifying problems, they can be solved.

So far, I have yet to see anything but spurious rejection about Wikis.
Truth be told, I did not originally like Wikis. But the core of the Wiki
is something that I do believe in - participation - so I played with it
anyway. And I liked it - while there are things that I do not believe a
Wiki should be used for, I will stand up for what they are good for. And
they certainly are good for education - perhaps the role is limited in
traditional institutions that are unwilling to adapt, but in time the
gatekeepers will retire or die. Wikis have a place in the future, I have
no doubt. As an autodidact, my interest in the present education system
is fleeting - my interest in the future education system will affect the
young people who I have grown to love, and who do not exist yet. My
nieces, my nephews, and perhaps someday my children. When I discuss
education, though I have taught at a few different levels, I do not
discuss it by staring at my feet. I look to the horizon, and the news
here is that the Wiki is no longer at the horizon. It's at our feet.
Deal with it.

Oddly enough, it was Ross Gardler's response to this that got me
tracking the conversation back. I know Ross from the time he spent in
Trinidad and Tobago, where he tried to institute such things at the
University of the West Indies - and met with success. Where he and I did
not see Wikis the same way a few years ago - slight differences between
strong personalities - I hope that my criticisms were constructive,
because if they contained phrases like 'unfounded hope' I would
certainly be ashamed of myself.

You live and you learn. At any rate, you live... When we talk about
adult literacy, I wonder how many professors strive to better themselves
at the same rate that they hope that their students learn. Maybe that's
my personal problem with a lot of professors, perhaps that's a
stereotype that I have with traditional education... Perhaps I suffered
under professors who did not believe in trying new things. Ahh, but the
ones who did... they failed here and there, but in sharing their
failures with we lowly students, they taught us more than a canned
curriculum can. I can name every instructor who did this. I cannot
remember those that did not. Clinging to an education system which has
grown larger buildings, more administration and consistently failed to
keep pace with curriculum is a problem.

Today we talk of the Wiki. Some criticize the Wiki as a tool, and yet
they do so without basis - claiming a lack of basis as the evidence that
they themselves lack. So all I ask is that they help gather the
evidence. I'd love to see where the Wiki in education has failed. And so
would people who use them.

Heck, even my favorite CMS has a Wiki module I can install. And you know
what? It's cool, and I have no use for it yet. But maybe someday I will.
It's a tool in a toolbox that evolves in the dark while I'm not looking.
I guess that's why I read random pages of the Wikipedia everyday. It's
not the technology, it's the concept of it's use that really makes it
worthwhile.

If there is unfounded hope... that unfounded hope is in expecting the
present system and only the tools of the last few centuries to get us to
the future without trying anything new. That's unfounded hope, but it's
backed by the same statistics that told NASA that a space shuttle
wouldn't explode... because one had never exploded before.

-- 
Taran Rampersad

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.linuxgazette.com
http://www.a42.com
http://www.worldchanging.com
http://www.knowprose.com
http://www.easylum.net

"Criticize by creating." - Michelangelo


_______________________________________________
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of the message.

_______________________________________________
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.

Reply via email to