Siobhan Green wrote: > Hi all, > > I was wondering what y'alls thoughts are on what the current browser > compliance standards should be for international audiences. I develop > websites for a variety of non-profits which want to ensure the sites > are accessible by the majority of users in developing countries. I > know that the sites need to be low bandwidth, 508 compliant/highly > usable.
One of the largest stumbling blocks - as you already pointed out - are the browsers that are not compliant with W3C standards when it comes to CSS, HTML and even Javascript. All of these can be worked around. My main problem, believe it or not, is the palette. Color palette differences are one of the largest problems, and would be something that I would wish were standardized. I use Mozilla as the standard browser for color palettes right now, and that's not because the palette is better but because on the sites I administrate and work with, Mozilla is dominant (40%) as well as the fact that Mozilla is more compliant with W3C standards than the browser most people get preinstalled. -- Taran Rampersad Presently in: Esteli, Nicaragua [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxgazette.com http://www.a42.com http://www.knowprose.com http://www.easylum.net "Criticize by creating." — Michelangelo _______________________________________________ DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of the message.
