Excellent talk! Now I finally understand what the buzz about DDL is about. My vague understanding was that it was basically a workaround for current D compilers support of dynamic libs. So I was content to just wait for D to get the kinks worked out eventually. But from your talk it seems much more like DDL is a better long term solution for dynamic linking of D code regardless.
--bb On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 5:40 AM, Tom S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As an added bonus, I've described the basics of DDL && xf.linker for those > who might want to play around with it: http://h3.team0xf.com/devlog/?p=12 > Please keep in mind that it only works with DMD+Windows at the moment. >
