On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu <[email protected]> wrote: > Bill Baxter wrote: >> >> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 6:20 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Bill Baxter wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Daniel de Kok <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 20:10:26 +0900, Bill Baxter wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> Version D 1.038 Dec 11, 2008 >>>>>>> New/Changed Features >>>>>>> * Added Partial IFTI Bugzilla 493 >>>>>> >>>>>> Hooray! Now I can finish porting std.algorithm and friends to D1! >>>>> >>>>> So, we'll see a new std2? :^) (I for one would be very happy) >>>> >>>> Not a new std2, just updates to the old one. But yeh. >>> >>> Apologies for the delay in updating std2. I've had a good reason (in >>> addition to having a dissertation to complete), see www.erdani.org. :o) >> >> I'm referring to this std2: http://www.dsource.org/projects/std2 >> I think you're referring to std in v2 Phobos, but if you really are >> referring to std2 then I look forward to the updates. ;-) >> >> --bb > > Sorry, I was indeed referring to std v2 in Phobos. I warn you guys, there's > going to be plenty of changes to std.algorithm.
With ranges and reference returns, I suspect so. D2's added special support for foreach over ranges, right? Is there anything else that had to change D2 in for ranges? Anyway, my personal goal with D2 is not so much to facilitate compiling D2 code in D1, but more to just bring similar functionality to D1. So if std2.algorithm gets stuck at today's rev because of porting issues, I can live with that. But currently there is no functioning version std.algorithm at all in D1 because of the heavy use of partial IFTI with those string alias parameters. --bb
